Sunday, July 21, 2013

LOST IN THE LAND OF MILK AND HONEY

Like a camera zooming in on one object, the news rivets our eyes to what they want us to see, but let's expand our vision to the larger picture for a moment. Remember when we used to joke about someday having a "big brother", or some would say, big government, welfare style, who would know all our business?  Not so funny anymore---with the news that it is now not only possible to learn all about us, but do-able, and in fact , has been done. Spying is in, secrets are out. Is that what Obama meant when he said his would be the most transparent administration ever---but it's our slip that's showing, and our  business that isn't our own anymore. In fact, we don't even know our own business--- like what really happened in Benghazi, who was really behind the IRS scandal, what's really in the Affordable Health Care Bill, and how it's going to affect us, who or why we're going to drone/kill next, or whether our email or phone calls are being monitored.  In short big brother, my dears, is here to take care of you.  Trust him, he says,  he only has your best interests at heart, along with his--- and will do what's best for the common good. Ask him to pull up a chair. help himself to our lives; then we can go our merry way, leaving politics to the politicians, the news to the internet headlines, and any political discussions to those who refuse to mind their manners and insist upon offering an actual, opinion as to the state of our national affairs. Opinions are out, taboo too---somebody might hold it against you, and worse,----somebody might be eaves dropping, and well, you never know what could happen next.  Better to get along, and hope everything will work out. Won't it?

 In China they still throw people in prison for saying the "wrong" thing. Couldn't happen here? Ask the man who aired the anti-Islam video, initially blamed for the Benghazi attack---and who is currently still in jail in New York,  purportedly for a probation violation--- for nine months??

 Some countries will penalize you for associating with the wrong folks---not here? Ask the reporters at the Associated Press.

And some people in power, will encourage  a lynch mob mentality, even after a man has been declared innocent by a legal jury. Eric Holder, our very own Attorney General, has said  the federal government will agree to a civil trial, in order to appease those who insist that George Zimmerman is a racist and acted accordingly, on the night that he confronted a young black man who appeared in his neighborhood and upon being followed, fought with Mr. Zimmerman.  Jesse Jackson, the self appointed civil rights leader, has been doing his best to form and conduct marches in the streets of big cities to express outrage, as to what they perceive as an injustice. And even Barack Obama, who had the bad the judgement to show his personal feelings, by referring to Trayvon Martin, as a son he might have had, thereby injecting not only race, but presidential prejudice into a pre-trial case.   Mr. Zimmerman will never walk free---he is a marked man, smeared by a biased media, and pursued by those who insist upon creating a racial mountain out of a tragic mano to mano confrontation that if it had been a black on black crime, would never have made front page news. What if the media's views are wrong---that instead, George Zimmerman acted inappropriately, stupidly, but was not an evil racist, and shot Trayvon Martin in self defense?  That is what the jury concluded after
studying all the evidence, piece by painful piece. It was a teachable moment---the jury dared to go
against popular opinion, though have requested that they remain anonymous. It isn't that the death of
a young man wasn't a tragic loss, or even that the possibility of an injustice occurred---it's that the jury had spoken and in this country, that has to be enough--or risk mockery of our own laws.

We have much to learn in our hearts and in our minds, but is anybody listening to all the lessons??  Have we learned that you can't trust one man or even a whole congress of politicians from both sides to do what's best for you or the country?  They are only as good as those who put them there, and require  constant vigilance, or ultimately they begin to love their careers and power more than us.

 Have we begun to see that the liberties and sense of freedom our carefully structured government is supposed to provide, is slipping away, step by subtle step, as we placidly accept and go along to get along?  Harry Reid is successfully trying to do away with the filibuster in order to shut up the opposing minority Republicans in his majority Senate.  Way to go Harry, but not in the best interests of a fair and balanced government.

 That others are making profound life altering decisions without our or even our congress' advise and consent--i.e. drones, new unvoted for green energy laws and taxes, and presidential tweaking of the health care laws in order to favor whomever is deemed politically important?

That  racial issues in this country, while  much improved, are still simmering below the surface and need only the slightest provocation to ignite? Are the rioters really rioting for justice, or simply reacting to a ginned up crowd mentality? Are we still guilty of the deeds of the past, and must continue paying retribution into eternity,--- thereby enabling, excusing, and perpetuating dependency of those, who in the short term may benefit from their victimization, but self destruct in the long haul.  Bill Cosby has tried to advance this theme, by pleading with his people to realize it's their responsibility to change their status and their future, by changing their behavior, not by remaining angry, resentful victims of the past. He has been scorned and criticized, but is he not to be admired for speaking a truth to a people who must claim their own destiny by refusing to cling to the misdeeds of the past, to realize that much has already changed for the better, and will continue to, but that they themselves must be part of the change? As important as laws we can make to effect change, trials we can lean toward emotion, not fact, sympathies we can feel,  self help is the  ultimate way out of the ghettos, the crime, the drugs, the one parent families, the life of a perpetual victim----to finally say, enough. We are done being slaves to our past.  President Obama, the greatest evidence of racial change in America, is proof that we have come a long ways, and that by choosing not to live a life of victimization, he rose to the top of his abilities.

In a weekend speech, the president spoke out once again regarding the Martin/Zimmerman trial. The country was waiting. What would he say this time? Would he use his bully pulpit to "Shut it down", as Pat Robertson, the religious talk show host had advised a few days ago, when things were heating up and there was fear of rioting in the streets? Or would he go personal again and speak as a black man, not a president of all the people?  He actually did both, and it was from this blogs's perspective, one of the best, if not the best speeches of his presidency. He attempted to have us see things through the eyes of those who have suffered the remnants of an unspeakable history. He went personal,
not in a political way, but a very believable, sincere and helpful way---he did not condone violence or the re-do of a trial, but he did try to lay out some of things our society and laws could do to help the remaining inequalities in our system.

Bravo to you, President Obama---you finally led, and it was a shining moment---perhaps the most defining, purposeful moment in your career. Yes, it probably helped you win even more minority votes, but it rang true, and  one had the feeling that for once, you had painfully examined every point of view,  considered the whole picture, and rose above the politics of it all. You gave us a glimpse of what you could have been---a president for all the people. Not just an agenda seeking, politician, hell bent on having his own way. Now----about that Benghazi thing

Zooming our camera back out, the shrieking chaos continues, and the drumbeats of perhaps too many tribes threaten to wreck havoc  upon this land.  Where is the peace, the balance, the voice that will bring calm and healing to our country? Perhaps we have lost our way indefinitely.

There is an email making the rounds that is entitled, "We Are Not Coming Back". It's gist is that we've gone too far off course, to ever return to a more stable, happier America.  But, if that's true, then, it's based on a false premise that all things were acceptable to all, and we know that's not true.

 Ask those who still carry the wounds of the past. We needed to change, make things better, see the world and ourselves differently----we needed to mature, to grow up.  Perhaps that's what we're doing now. We are like a huge, noisy, brawling family, but who underneath, all want the same thing-- a little prosperity, peace, happiness, and the freedom to pursue those things--- but we are pulling in too many different directions. Is Big Bro the answer? Don't think so---big brothers, like big governments,  only work if they have little, lost, needy people to boss around.  That's not us,  is it???    

  







.













   
















22 comments:

  1. I can't remember the riots you write about. Weren't the Martin domonstrations peaceful? I wish more poeple had the facts about 21st century racism, named "the new Jim Crow" by Michelle Alexander. It's hidden from those of us in all white enclaves. Whether you watch the mainline media, and even watch/read the other two extremes, you just don't get the information. That's the newest thing about the "new" Jim Crow. It's hidden. ...Unless you're living it. Neither President Obama nor Bill Cosby have adequately articulated the predicament people of color still find themselves in. Better that we privileged keep silent until we do actually see the big picture.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The hearts of men and women change much more slowly, unfortunately than their laws. It is true that non-blacks do not see things through the same lens, as Obama made clear, and vice versa. But the young people today are much further along in treating people equally, then we are----even their rear view mirror doesn't reflect the inequalities of the past, and so they start with an even playing field. So there is hope. My main concern, however, is that the black community begin to not use the past as a crutch, and to start countering the things that are holding them down within their own control---start preaching the negative affect of teen pregnancies and too many children, drug dependency, and lack of education. When crimes involving blacks, are predominately black on black, and 72% of families are single parent households, and drugs are all too common, something needs to be changed from the inside out---their leadership is not addressing these things enough, choosing instead to continuously referring to them as victims. Even Obama touched on this--wish he would stressed it more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I once lived in Detroit, and I hate to see it go down the tubes, especially on the backs of those who counted on it for their old age pensions. Allowing Detroit to go bankrupt is just one more example of "sticking it to the poor", while corporate execs thrive even more. More frightening is the prospect of Detroit becoming the model for other hard pressed cities. This may have been a recession for some of us, but for those experiencing it personally it's a depression, and it isn't getting any better. Wealth continues to slip through the fingers of the average Joe and into the pockets of the super rich, and I think it's too late to make the necessary corrections. The general populace seems to know what needs to be done, but Congress has been hijacked by special interests with big bucks, and everyone is so dispirited and bewildered they aren't rising up and demanding a change in course. And at this point it would take change on a scale of monumental dimensions. ... Too much to hope for. So, I forecast the virtual impoverishment of formerly comfortable Americans while a tiny fraction become even more obscenely privileged. "Entitlements"? Are these wealthy takers "entitled" to desicrate the American standard of living? You want to defend them. You want to identify with the "winners". So you argue against your own better interests and those of the people you actually know. So enjoy the "game". Root for the winning side. Blame the victims for not improving themselves fast enough, as if that were the key to reversing the tide. The Republican politicians may even succeed in their last ditch, 40th try to trash Obamacare. Hello, 3rd world. You have come home.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Are you kidding me?? You can't possibly be so narrow minded as to think anyone who espouses an opposite view from yours is simply pandering to the rich and "wanting to identify with the winner." Don't ever assume you know why somebody believes as they do---it is an arrogance and affront that insists one has a monopoly on the "right way" to think. I don't subscribe to class envy, or the theory that the country's ills are all to be laid at the feet of the rich. Nor do I think that they have "desicrated" the American standard of living. Really? What a crock. There are many other factors for the weakened economy we are experiencing, not the least of which is due, in my opinion and many others, to the current administration's policies.

    The plight of the poor has increased, not gotten better under Obama.
    The middle class is not being helped at all in spite of Obama's constant flag waving on their behalf. Gas prices higher than ever, unemployment still too high, the economy growing at only a very small pace. And when Obamacare really kicks in, things are going to very much worse, as employers cut back on hiring, which they are already doing, premiums will go up, and the finest, quality health care in the world will not longer be the United States.

    Detroit? Tell me you don't really believe that the Unions didn't have a lot to do with the demise of that city---they broke the bank. As far as blaming the victims---I don't blame them for all their problems, nor do I lack sympathy for them. It is easy to shed tears and speak of compassion---harder to speak a harsher truth. I think that if they themselves continue to blame all others , they will never be anything but victims. There are things within their control, that could help them---but instead, there are those who make careers out of parading about as their saviors, are doing them a disservice by not pointing out their responsibilities as well as the injustices.

    I'm not defending the rich---I just don't blame them or think they should be punished for being rich. That's class warfare, and again, we never had so much of it for so few, before the present administration. It's spread the wealth propaganda on steroids, and if people are bewildered, it's because they don't recognize their own country any more---nor can anyone figure out what to do about, short of a civil war, which isn't us anymore. The Republicans seem unable to do anything but go along for fear of being labeled villainous and mean spirited---and meanwhile Obama goes his merry way breaking and making laws, under the very suspicious use of executive power.

    If one day , the rich are no longer so rich, the jobs not so plentiful, the investments made by the rich not done anymore, the tax base shrunken from an even worse economy, and there is no more trickling down from those who once spent their money, but who are now either without, or holding onto it, what then?? There will be no more winners--because it won't pay to win. Where will the money come from to support all of us????

    And therein lies our differences---a friend recently said, the American people are mostly to the center right in their thinking. I agree with that---problem is, extreme left seems to be winning the battle. Most of us are tired of fighting, but even more, sad. Very, very sad. Because we know it won't work---never has, never will.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So, Mayor Bloomberg is all upset by the judge's ruling on stop & frisk. He really believes most crime happens in black or brown communities, so that's where stop & frisk is most often used. He doesn't seem to realize that most arrests occur in black and brown communities because that's where stop & frisk is most frequent. We really don't know what the crime rate in white communities because stop & frisk is rarely used there. If it were, people would be up in arms about it. And why is violent crime down in NYC? It correlates with the banning of lead in gasoline.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's a fine line between preventing crime before it happens and at the same time being just and fair at all times. Unfortunately and for whatever reasons, most crimes do occur in black and brown communities. That isn't fair either, because poverty and unfortunate circumstances breed crime. But what to do? Frisking was one answer, Which may save many folks who live in those crime prone communities from victimization. It isn't fair either that all of us are subjected to security checks at airports, including full frisking at times. But it may
    have saved many of us from further terrorist attacks.

    Badgering and undue arrests are dead wrong---and that probably goes on. That should be stopped, but completely backing away from the one thing police can do to curtail crime seems to be more a political correct move than practical. We'll see what happens if the new law is allowed to stand. Figures don't lie.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Are more crimes committed in black and brown communities, or just more arrests. Before the War on Drugs commenced, people were afraid of their neighbors. Now they're afraid of the police! But I don't think our views are that far apart. Do you?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think we both want the best for a people who were dealt a disastrous hand in life---so bad that in some cases it is virtually impossible to escape their circumstances. Much has been done to help, hearts and minds are slowly changing, but I still feel strongly that it is now time for the black community, especially, to take on the challenge of changing their own behavioral patterns, claim a different destiny than that of victim and collateral damage to their past. We can and should change and improve at every opportunity their circumstances by better, more fair laws and enforced anti-bias actions, but they could do so much more to help themselves out of their, in many cases, self made misery. If it takes a village to raise a child, it also takes a village to decide it can be more than a ghetto, a crime ridden, gang hangout--the bigger enemy is within, not without. Let's not confuse the attempt to keep order and safety with bias and cruel authority. Not saying the police are without such trespasses, but give them a break too---it's a tough job.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I heard a black man say recently that whites, especially whites who live in small white enclaves, have no right to pronounce on the conditions or responsibilities of the blacks, of whom they have no first hand knowledge. I have had some close contact with black communities in my career, and yet I feel quite ignorant of the current state of affairs, especially since being removed from them for over thirty years. I try to redress this lack through reading books such as Michelle Andersen's THE NEW JIM CROW, but I am not a sociologist so I have little context from which to judge such works. I do know that we already have a thriving, if small, black middle class who have escaped the ghetto already. That should be recognized. But I don't know that those left behind could "do so much more to help themselves". How do you presume to know? Did you happen to read the classic, THERE ARE NO CHILDREN HERE by Alex Kotlowitz (1992)? Or where are you getting your information? Nor do I know that black communities across the country are "crime ridden". The poor people I met 30 years ago and before were not criminally inclined at all. Many people, black, brown, white, rich or poor are victims of self-made misery, but what has been demonstrated is that comprehenisive (usually government) programs which attack problems from several interlocking angles do succeed in raising people out of seemingly hopeless situations. Unfortunately, what is available is almost always a fractured system bewildering to even the most industrious souls. This is even true in my own white community. And as for the criminal justice system, it has only been within the last few weeks that government at the national and local levels are beginning to act to correct the racial biases there. I, too, think we should give the police a break and commend them for performing their duties under sometimes unreasonably stressful conditions. I like the motto of the Parker, Colorado police department: "Freedom through safety", and I think that expresses the spirit of the police in my own community. But this is not about my own community. I truly don't know how much racial profiling is going on in large cities or in other parts of the country. Do you?

    ReplyDelete
  10. None of us can know what it's really like to live in someone else's shoes, but the facts are there to support the premise that the black race in particular needs more than laws and programs to pull them out of poverty and lower class status. Are you suggesting that is all they need? I think that is a disservice to the very people you wish to help.

    Racial profiling is wrong, and is slowly disappearing, but it will not go away completely until those who indulge in it wrongly are overwhelmed by the lack of reasons to do so.

    Empathy and compassion are not always wrapped in sympathy and blame---many of us abhor the crimes of the past against the blacks of this country, but dream that someday we will see them take their rightful place in society, and find a different path other than that of beneficiaries ----starting with refusing to have babies they cannot support, refusing to join gangs and a life of drugs, and staying in school. There are already those who have done those things, but more need to be led by their own people, not continuously encouraged to be victims by those who make a career out of keeping them down.

    Btw, it may surprise you to know I have done considerable reading of the black problem, and even wrote about it many years ago in Thom's paper---am also very aware that there is much bigotry remaining in our society, and continue to feel much pain about all that was and is---but I have come full circle I think in concluding that they, themselves, must do more to help themselves---it is the missing piece in a long struggle, and has more potential for leverage than perhaps any other solution. That is not to say that laws should not be made to protect, or changed to guard against the impediment of a race that still has a long ways to go to realize their full potential .

    For further food for thought---see "The Butler", a movie just out. It will break your heart, but give you hope that things have and will continue to change.

    ReplyDelete
  11. How do you know non-whites are not already doing "more to help themselves", that they are not already providing your so called "missing link"?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Evidence not there---i.e. 73% of babies are born to unwed women, more crimes committed by "non-blacks", and percentage of non-black prison population is higher (yes, I know you would debate that), and huge school drop out rate. All are self behavioral patterns that could be self controlled. Again, changing biased laws is right and must be done---granted. But to deny that self help is important at this point in time is to continue to pander and excuse, keeping them down, not finally see them rise up and out by perhaps the strongest help of all--self determination.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Since we're speaking race, we should recognize that numerically there are more whites receiving government benefits aimed at the poor than any other ethnic group. They are not as visible because they are not concentrated in "ghettos" but are dispersed in the suburbs, sometimes with two or more families living under one roof. They may or may not work, but most of them, as with most blacks, are not pleased existing on the paltry "entitlements" available to them. They wish to improve themselves and provide for their families. Most of them, as with blacks, use TANF to help pull themselves to less desperate conditions. One shutters to think of their and their children's fate were no help at all in place to help them. That isn't what you're suggesting, is it?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Of course not--so easy to paint conservatives in such broad, mean strokes. We were speaking of the black community in particular, who still, though with many exceptions, and more arriving all the time, have not reached their full potential as a whole race. No one is advocating not helping them,---we have and are doing so, and should probably do even more. But many, including their own race, are encouraging them to do more to help themselves by refusing to be part of the drug culture, refusing to have children without a dependable father or family structure to nurture and care for the child, by absolutely staying in school so that they can get jobs and self respect----by refusing to stay down and be fed at the nipple of govt., instead of finding their own strength.

    Having the rotten luck to be born into poverty ,despair, and bias is indeed not fair, and difficult to overcome. That is where outside help is needed and deserved---but the ones who make it out, and there are those, are those who have inside help, either within themselves or within the family unit--not necessarily a government program. The social network is all well and good, but I'm simply pleading the case for this race of people to as a whole, decide to stop being victims, and start changing the behavior patterns that only they can change. Martin Luther King felt the same way, I believe---Jesse Jackson, not so much.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I hope no blacks are eavesdropping on this conversation, as they would rightly nail us as naive, but aside from some of your ways of putting things I am in agreement with you. Keep in mind that even though blacks have the highest unemployment rate of any ethnic group, at least 70% are not unemployed and are productive members of society. Yes, to be born into an area of concentrated poverty is terribly disabling. The resources on many levels are lacking and outside assistance can provide the kick start that provides opportunity to many. But, racism aside, what do you have to say about the victims in places like Michigan which has lost 50% of its industry since the '80s?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I am sure that many blacks would call us naive, just as they cannot fully appreciate or know how many of us feel about the guilt associated with the past, and our inability to undo, compensate enough, and make everything right. However, I have heard many black people speak the same thoughts that I have expressed about their own disappointment in their own people to speed up the process of taking their rightful place in society.

    Are you assigning more guilt re Michigan's failures? Much has to do with modern day progress, union over reach, and poor choice of leadership. It is unfortunate, but we are all, to some degree, victims of the same things---Michigan's problems were more magnified, for sure, but unfortunately, change often breeds victims.

    ReplyDelete
  17. So let's change the subject and talk about climate change. Are you in agreement with Rush Limbaugh?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yes and No---I think much of the global warming or climate change as they like to call it now is politically driven. There are many scientists who disagree, so I don't think the current opinion that is carrying the media and popular opinion is infallible. However, I think climate change is inevitable and cyclical and has been going on forever--the caution is to not go overboard and be persuaded to go to extremes, as though we can somehow control the weather, thereby giving up many of our conveniences and resources which put many people to work and affect our lifestyle dramatically. Don't trust Al Gore--he has made virtual fortune off his unfounded opinions and many think that our going along with all the changes are "sheople" like, and falling even further into the hands of a govt. controlled society.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 3% of the scientists disagree.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Science is purportedly based on hard, proven, infallible fact. There is none in this case, as it is based on theory, emotional hype, and political gain--- or that we are under going some phenomenal, disastrous changes--- and moreover, that we can effect the reversal of such---it will be minimal at best, but dramatically change our lives, our economy, life styles, and our personal finances. All this in a time where we are already precariously perched on an economy that threatens to come apart at the seams with unemployment, only 2% growth, and incomes not keeping up with the cost of living. Save the planet, while killing the jobs and factories that create the jobs, to say nothing about the high cost of clean energy to households, the high cost of gas or substitutes, and cars, etc. that need to meet all the stringent regulations. Am I saying we should do nothing about pollution and other proven threats to our environment? No, but I am advocating a dialing down of the hysteria and drama---moderation in all things. We cannot stick our head in the sand, of course, but neither should we be building a society based on fear and unproven theories.

    ReplyDelete
  21. What do you think should be done about Assad's poison gas attack on his own people?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bad, bad very bad---but I'm not convinced we should go to war, or even attack on moral grounds. Though I don't presume to speak for "the American people", I think we are weary of wars, and losing our young men to old men's political maneuverings and efforts to interfere with other country's affairs, especially those of conflicting religious views. If they become a threat to our security, a terrorist nest, or become part of a middle east caliphate, perhaps then we need to re-calculate, but this appears to be a civil war---let them sort it out.

    Problem is we're never really apprised of all the information and actions taking place behind the scenes---could be more to it than we presently understand---I have a friend who insists there are power sources right here in our government puppeteering the whole thing, trying to engineer and create a war for less than altruistic reasons. Don't know about that, but agree we never see the whole picture.

    Pres. Obama worries me---I think he's measuring the political temperature, instead of the pragmatic consequences and reasons for striking Syria. His leadership lacks true substance and depth of wisdom. Drawing red lines, then backing off doesn't incur much respect or cause anyone to bow to our demands anymore.

    What think you??

    ReplyDelete