Thursday, May 5, 2011

DETAILS, DETAILS---WHO CARES?

In the middle of Donald Trump's "Celebrity Apprentice" last Sunday night, the alert bulletin flashed across the TV screen--"News Alert from the White House". "Gotcha'", I thought--Obama is getting even with Trump's audacious remarks regarding Obama's qualifications. But it was the real deal, the biggest deal of the year--Osama bin Laden was not only found, but captured and killed---details to follow. The devil may be in those details, but let him give it a rest for now. It was a rare moment of stunning news----good news, grateful news, relieving news. We had waited a long time for this, and had all but given up hope that Osama, the man who became the face of terrorism and who had changed this country overnight with the attack on 9/11, would ever be brought to justice. President Obama gave a short speech---he asked that we rejoice together and remember how it is to come together as a united country. We did and we do---but probably not for long. We are united in our ability to divide over anything at all, and this was no exception. The details coming out will give us much to opine about---but do we have to? Apparently so.

For starters, who was this man--and why did he hate us? His message was murky, but his methods were deadly. He denounced our way of life, and took it upon himself to change it. But who was he to judge and take us on as his enemy? It was always a tricky thing---what did we call this rogue muslim who had somehow managed to wage war against the most powerful country in the world? He had no army, no uniforms, no rules of engagement, and no respect for even the lives of his own followers. He was responsible for many attacks prior to 9/11, but that one got our full, stunned attention---we were in the cross hairs of this one man and his scattered "cells" who were hell bent of destroying, if not all of us, enough of our security to rattle our national phyche ,dramatically change our life style, and alter many of our freedoms. We were now not so free, and sadly watched as we sent our men and women off to fight this phantom enemy called Al Queda. Their numbers seem to multiply and morph until finally they were here among us, like a contagious disease, infecting even some of our own citizens who were wooed at the prospect of becoming a martyr for a cause they thought was worth dying for---extreme jihadists, or lost souls, doing the bidding of a man and his hatred for "infidels"---or so he proclaimed.

Like most other cult figures, Osama bin Laden was a false prophet, an arrogant, egotistical, but rich and charismatic leader who used religion as a cover and an excuse to murder and gain notoriety for his own political/religious views. In the end he was nothing but a pathetic old man, an outlaw on the run and forced to hide for the rest of his life, and finally in a "mansion", which turned out to look more like a cold, fortressed prison. He could trust no one and ultimately was betrayed by others of his "troops" who had been captured and interrogated. He died at the hands of his self made enemy, having not accomplished much but chaos ,mass murder, and a terror which did indeed change, but did not bring us to our knees. He would never accomplish his goals, but he paradoxically managed to cast a shadow upon his own Islamic religion, even as we struggled to separate it from the extreme and perverted beliefs that he touted.

The great irony is that as his quest ended to conquer the world with his version of a fringe, religious society, where freedom and democracy would no longer exist, the opposite has begun to flourish in the middle east, known now as the Arab Spring. Egypt was the largest explosion of the thirst for democracy, and other Arab countries will surely follow in her wake, as the youth in their ability to connect with freer nations will rise up and demand their freedoms. Iraq has already been unshackled from the constraints of a oppressive, despotic rule, and Afghanistan is slowly finding its way to a democracy, as we help it along. Perhaps technology and its wide spread communication effects was and is the real enemy to those who would attempt to stifle and over power whole countries with their ideologies and exclusionary religions. The light of a free people shines brighter than of those who must bow and subjugate to other mens' wishes---and that light will draw and warm the world as more and more people see it shining brightly via their television sets, their cell phones, and their computers.

Before this week is out, there will be many conflicting opinions and debates regarding the killing of Osama bin Laden. As usual we will turn ourselves inside-out arguing and debating as to whether it was right and just, or wrong and illegal. There are those who say the body should not have been given even the dignity of a Muslim ceremonial burial at sea, that the gruesome photos should be made public, that we should have co-operated more with the Pakistani government, ya-da, ya-da. But for most of us, the deed is thankfully done, the witch is dead, and hang the details.

Terrorism will no doubt live on for awhile, but we know the enemy now, and it knows we will fight back hard and long. We have toughened as a nation and perhaps in our awareness of those who would harm us, we have become less self absorbed and more resolved to spread and encourage democracy, so that others may enjoy our freedoms and not be caught in the paralyzing grip of those who would enslave them to their particular beliefs and agendas.

I was proud of President Obama the other night as he approved the plan and gave the order to finish the hunt for Osama. That couldn't have been easy and was fraught with the possibility of failure. I have always been proud of George W. Bush for leading us through one of the most tumultous, frightening times in our history . But I was most proud of our brave military men who pulled off a highly skilled military manuever and risked their lives for us all. All of them deserve our respect and gratitude for performing their most solemn duty--to keep us safe. They kept their promise, and it would seem fitting that we dispense with hair splitting details and the bickering among ourselves.

To those who wish to pick over the minutiae and find fault with the execution of the plan to capture and possibly kill upon certain orders the man who thought nothing of beheading, bombing, and burning those he hated, may I say--- get over it. Was he a criminal, deserving of a trial, or a militant combatant, who was sought and killed as any other enemy number one would be? That may be up to a higher authority than ours. Either way, his guilt was self confessed many times over, and he wasn't done with us yet, as evidenced by material from his computer files taken during the raid. This was a man who willfully chose his fate. May God have mercy on his soul--and may there not be a virgin in sight.





.

10 comments:

  1. Excellent piece! I can't disagree with anything you've written, but I'd like to add that the negative view of the USA in the Middle East is not necessarily their disapproval of our way of life but their reaction to US foreign policies which impact their lives in concrete ways and which most Americans are unaware. And speaking of details: I fear we may leave Afghanistan to the Taliban now that Osama is history, and I pity anyone who would have to live under that tyrany again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Changing the subject back to a previous topic, FYI: According to USA TODAY "Americans are paying the smallest share of their income for taxes since 1958....The total tax burden--for all federal, state and local taxes--dropped to 23.6% of income...according to Bureau of Economic Analysis data. By contrast, individuals spent roughly 27% of income on taxes in the 1970s, 1980s and the 1990s--a rate that would mean $500 billion of extra taxes, one-third of the estimated $1.5 trillion deficit this year."

    ReplyDelete
  3. That would be another blog---and not tonight. But just to give you a little appetizer---revenue does not come from taxes---jobs and a healthy economy do. Taxes come from revenue already earned that could be put back into the economy via consumer spending, instead of continuously feeding the hand that keeps taking---I'm sure we'll get to the main course of this soon!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Such black and white theoretical thinking unsupported by history is sure to get us all in trouble, if it's not too late already. The "hand" has been taking less and less, but jobs and the economy have diminished except for a privileged few.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just for conversation sake---the state of the job market and the economy can hardly be blamed on fewer taxes---let's be honest about that. And higher taxes would not improve either one---in fact, many economists think it would worsen the entire situation. Our corporate tax is one of the highest in the world, and one of the reasons our jobs are leaving the U.S.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Where have you obtained your information about corporate taxes? Do you know how little corporations actually pay? Seriously: Do you have a number? The deficit CAN be blamed on fewer taxes, especially the tax breaks given to persons hoarding massive amounts of money--and to what purpose? Do you believe they use that money to create jobs? Recent history should have persuaded you otherwise. There is an optimum level of taxation, neither too high nor too low. Right now it is the lowest since 1950.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Okay---I feel like a fillet being grilled on the alter of socialism--but here goes. The figures I read quite consistently from various reliable sources are that U.S. corps.are taxed second only to Japan--in the neighborhood of 39%. Need I remind you about the effects of inflation on say $100,00000 is quite different than in the 50's? What do you think is a fair and "optimum" level of taxation?? Paul Ryan's idea to plug the loopholes for the corps. seems like a reasonable one, while at the same time lowering their taxes in order to keep more of them on our shores. Having said this, you can rest assured that everyone's taxes are going to go up---except probably for almost half (about 47%) of the population who pay no federal tax at all!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. General Electric paid absolutely no taxes last year.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I believe that has to do with so many of the loop holes provided, some of which are this administration's focus on "green energy"tax breaks.MOst of the big corps. pay around 35% in taxes, second only in the world to Japan, who I understand, is considering lowering their corp. tax. I like Ryan's plan to do away with those loop holes and at the same time lower taxes for the corps. thereby encouraging them to keep business on these shores. There are no easy answers, but big bus. are not villians nor saviors of the economy. They are a simply a function of our system, otherwise known as capitalism. They are not non-profit oriented, nor should they be expected to be---they are what they are---money makers, and along the way, they employ lots of people. Strangle them with higher and higher taxes, and more and more regulations and we will wonder where our country went. Does it not bother you that approx. 47 % of our population pays no federal taxes?

    ReplyDelete
  10. It is not true that 47% if our population pay no federal taxes, but you are right that about 47% of our population pay no federal INCOME TAXES. But this oversimplifies the matter because it hasn't addressed who those 47% are: Families with children, the elderly, the disabled and the poor. And these people are subject to FICA, payroll taxes and Medicare premiums as well as state and local sales taxes, property taxes and gasoline taxes to name just a few. FICA taxes end at $106,500, so most of the rich are taxed for Social Security on only a fraction of their income. And those 47% are paying their fair share and maybe more. What does bother me is that so many working people are paid so little that they're not liable for the federal income tax and that there are so many poor in this country.

    ReplyDelete