What a hot mess we found ourselves in last week---government gone amok, out of control, and who's running the store? We don't know yet, but it's not looking good for any of us, most especially the President. otherwise known as the CEO and leader of the free world. First Ben Ghazi, now comes the IRS and the AP scandals---but not to worry, nobody's to blame---nobody important anyway. No siree, ---at least that's the party line. David Axelrod, advisor to Mr. Obama expanded upon his save their a-- story by claiming that the government is" too vast" an entity to keep track of every little thing that happens and presidents, in case you're wondering, cannot be expected to know everything. Seriously, Mr. Axelrod? We thought you liked big, vast governments. Your incredible ability to defend this presidency is exceeded only by your apparent and insulting conviction that people are too complacent or ill informed to question the very questionable actions, or lack thereof, of this administration. But guess what? He may be right! Today's polls show Obama's approval rating at 53%, which is considered pretty darn good, especially since the same polls show Americans don't approve of the way he's handled any of the crises. So what's up with this dichotomy of opinions?? How can we love Obama, but not like what he does?
Elementary, my dear Watson---the man has style, charisma, and a silver tongue. He admits to no involvement in anything negative, ever. No, no, no--- he sees, hears, nor speaks no evil---unless he's speaking about Republicans---or anybody who opposes or disagrees with him. Then we see a different man, kind of a scary, bullying kind of man. His partisanship is overbearing, but it comes across as parental scolding, rather than the dangerous over use of his power. What was he said once in a speech about "punishing our enemies and rewarding our friends"? And who can forget how he called out and humiliated Supreme Court Justice Roberts in front of the entire congress for helping to push through the "Citizens United" legislation, which allows for large corporations or any large groups to donate money to their favorite candidate, and was in Obama's mind a real threat to his second term candidacy.
Obama is the master of floating above the fray, but at the same time getting his digs in---he ridiculed those in the Tea Party as "Teabaggers", and has allowed others in his administration to say even worse things----yes, I'm referring to old "they wanta keep ya'll in chains" Joe Biden, V.P. That was a despicable, racist remark aimed at, you guessed, the Republicans, and was anything but presidential. or even vice presidential--more like a school yard intimidation technique. Shut 'em up, label them bad, make them very, very afraid--- is that what's happening here, a "culture of intimidation", as Mitch O'Connell, Senate Minority leader, said was the reason for all the cover-ups and mis- deeds by underlings who should know better, but misbehave anyway, even at the risk of losing their jobs?
Has Obama set a tone, an example that at the very least encourages others to do what they think he would approve, or give a wink and a nod, instead of punishment? His outrage and indignation this week belie what seems to be the flip side of his public, supposedly principled personality---win, at all costs. And his indignation seems to reach a boil when he's the one being criticized---we are not to attack his integrity--no matter that it's beginning to look a little insufficient to the task---and even if he, himself, betrays his own pronouncements of fairness and dignity to all.
Are we really to believe that our president knew nothing of Ben Ghazi until it was too late? Possible, but not admirable--shouldn't he have known? Or that the first he knew of the AP being requested to give out phone numbers of certain reporters was when he read about it in the newspapers?? Again, conceivable, but maybe if the government weren't so vast, he could have known, or at least made it known that he needed to be informed of such dangerous overstepping--- And that he only just learned of the IRS targeting conservative and other groups posing a threat to his election??? Come'on, that strikes at the heart and very core of our liberties to protect and preserve our rights to dissent---we should be very, very afraid. And the prez should either 'fess up or shake up the people to whom he has entrusted to do the work of the country. The erosion of trust has to seep up to the White House---because either they knew about all the infractions , or they did not---if they knew, and did nothing about it, shame on them. If they did not know---same shame, and more blame to those who bear the burden of the buck stop.
And yet, and yet--- Obama and company continue to bathe in the warmth of public approval. Not for what he does, mind you, but for how he looks, and what he says---which is that he will continue to do his job of fighting for the poor and middle class. Really? I thought he also had a few other responsibilities, like that of Commander and Chief, and preserving our rights to free speech and thought.
Obama says we will get to the bottom of these latest scandals---seems he said that about Ben Ghazi---oh, I forgot, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, said, "What difference does it make now?" Hillary, that has to go down in history as one of the lamest, dismissable, and inappropriate remarks ever---are you kidding us? But so very Clinton-esque----"depends on what the word is, is".
Excuse us for asking---but when will we stop approving, adoring, and ignoring---and start demanding accountability from an administration and its leader whose cred is growing very thin, even as "like" polls are up. Popularity is often an imposter----and woe to us who discover too little, too late. Because even the poor and middle class lose, if all of us lose our right to disagree without vengeful payback and intimidation, and to demand to know the truth when our people are killed, while serving in a foreign country. It makes a huge difference, Hillary. We may be slow to learn sometimes, but our memories are long---
One last thought----for those who will continue to blame the Republicans for using these latest rounds of scandals for political reasons---have at it. It is difficult these days to separate politics from true outrage.But this time, there is something very non-partisan imbedded in the IRS and AP invasions of privacy. If left unaddressed, preferably by an independent counsel, and unpunished, we are leaving open the door to behind the scenes intimidation, which will lead ultimately to people being afraid to speak their minds, write their opinions, challenge the status quo, donate their money to causes of their choice, and very possibly to a one party country--it won't be the America we used to know. And it won't be anybody's fault, because nobody knew anything----except those who blew whistles, and who knew better than to dismiss the mounting evidence of a system which got too big too manage, and too political to be trusted.
Monday, May 20, 2013
Saturday, April 20, 2013
SICK AND TIRED
The Boston bombing last Monday was yet another reminder that all is not well. Still reeling from the Newtown, Mass. school shooting, and bombarded daily by nuclear threats of a North Korean despot wishing to taunt and rattle the big, bad United States of America, we sadly shook our heads and wept as news spread that once again, we had been struck by an unknown enemy, hell bent on creating fear, chaos and destruction---and breaking our hearts as we learned that one of the dead victims was again one of our most precious, an 8 year old boy, caught in the web of an evil he will never understand, much less deserve. How can we expect children to understand what is happening to our once relatively peaceful and safe country, when we can hardly wrap our own minds around a growing sense of danger and sudden violence within our midst, no longer on some distant shore. No, things are not at all well---there is a collective feeling of losing our grip, our very ability to remain free in an increasingly policed society. Are we slowly coming apart at the seams?? Surrendering our freedoms to those who would harm us, terrorize us into submission, or simply get attention for their own sick minds? Or is this just a time of transition, a rough patch from which we will recover, wiser and stronger? There is always hope, as they saying goes, but the current feeling is that we have a ways to go---and even more disconcerting, that no one knows the way back or forward. This is unchartered territory---
Are we hopelessly lost? Sick of it all, somewhat bewildered, and too tired to fight back? We are asked to become more vigilant for anything suspicious looking in order to fight terrorism---really? Is that all it will take? Wars and vicious crimes are rarely won by vigilance---that may stop or derail an act of terror--but it won't stop the next plan or the incentive to keep trying. As these words are written, it has become known that the Boston bombing suspects were two young Russian men with vague and rumored connections to Jihadist organizations. Regardless of the connection, the act was one of terrorism. The two men had gone to school here, one became a U.S. citizen, but we and our way of life were presumably, and if they are found guilty, no match for those who drew them into their circle of religious fervor. It was almost a relief to hear that at least it probably wasn't "one of our own", another mentally ill person, acting out his crazed misery upon us all. Domestic terrorism is harder to bear, as it is home grown, and carries with it our own home grown problems. But at least we can deal with it on our terms.
International terrorism, on the other hand, is a tough enemy to fight---they are all over the world, and now they are here, among us. They despise us and feel there is no greater honor than to die in martyrdom while fighting for their cause. Even our president, Barack Obama, seems overwhelmed at the oncoming waves of unfortunate events---his careful words, in describing the Boston bombing, as anything but terrorism, show a man understandably using great restraint, and perhaps wisdom, but his handling of otherwise obvious cases of terrorism in this country and abroad,( i.e. Fort Hood, Ben Ghazi) together with his "leading from behind' philosophy in other international crises, suggest a certain timidity and weakness, even a reluctance to confront an enemy, naming it for what it is. He has characterized our past mode of operandi as too bullying and aggressive, rather than perhaps a necessarily strong leadership, in a world all too eager to fill a vacuum with their own agendas. Has Obama weakened us with his domestic divisive attitudes, his less than bold presence on the world scene, and his refusal to address the Jihad infiltration problem right here in this country---or made us better, less agitating? Does a kinder, gentler nation stand a chance against religious zealots who do not value life over their beliefs, or power hungry nations who crave dominion over freedom?
We are feeling less secure, as the inevitable spread of religious extremism marches not only into other countries, but into our own, our towns, and murder even our children. It has become very personal, and very deadly. We knew they would come, it was inevitable, only a matter of time---but what to do about it? Should we begin to see that we cannot ignore or allow other countries to become united against us--not even distant Libya, Iraq, Syria or Egypt, some of whose causes seemed just, but whose outcome is dubious? North Korea, on the other hand, is using its own brand of terrorism, as its young leader, Kim Jung Un taunts us with his supposed nuclear capability---he is the biggest bomb of all now, and one wonders where he gets off taking on the United States of America---and getting away with it. We are now negotiating with him via China---blackmail might be a better term. He has been put on the back pages of the media for now, but we shall hear from him again---terror, via nuclear bomb threats in the hands of a young, foolish anti-American autocrat, may become the worst terror of all.
But as we picked up the pieces of another life shattering event last Monday in Boston, the strength and compassion of our people as they rushed into the flames to administer comfort and aid was proof that we don't run from problems---and that when the chips are down, we, the citizens, help our neighbors and ourselves. The people of Boston came through big time with almost instantaneous response. Sick and tired? Not when the chips are down---and it didn't take an act of congress to get help. Our system of law and order worked admirably, bravely, and swiftly--though not without further loss of life, as one officer was killed and another injured. The suspects have been caught and if proven guilty will be brought to justice---life will move along. We will be a little more wary, a little less joyful, and a lot more aware that our lives have changed, along with our country. The land of the free and the home of the brave---seems to be under siege at the moment and perhaps for some time to come. Are we courageous and good enough to remain free, and not intimidated slaves of terroristic blackmail, or some other form of rule or government? The answer remains unknown---but the little boy who died on Monday deserves a better place. He wrote before he died, "Please no more hurting people"---if only it were that easy. And if only the enemy cared---
On Friday, Boston went into complete lock-down mode. One of the suspects was found and shot dead Friday morning. The other brother remained at large, but not for long. Before it was over, stores were closed, ball games cancelled, schools locked and empty, and people told to stay inside their homes. Incredible--- a whole American city brought to its knees by two young men, apparently with a mission to do just that.
Someone said this week that America is being tested---to see what we're made of. Evil has come calling, right here at home---whether it is a religious fanatic, a power lusting foreign leader, or a deranged person out to kill in order to vent his rage---the result is the same, but the former is more dangerous, for its army is invisible, and it's goal is elimination of all who do not believe in their cause and their way of life. It is a creeping, relentless, determined enemy, and though we are not its only target, we are the biggest, and the most reviled. Monday was a grim reminder that they who would harm us are not going away. We are made of many things, and what we were, is not necessarily who we are today. But as we watch our freedoms being slowly chipped away by those who wish to take us down, it remains to be seen who we will become.
President Obama said this week that Americans refuse to be terrorized---talk is cheap, but I liked that, and him for standing strong. If only it were that easy----didn't work for the little boy with the sign. But maybe we are getting sick of being sick and tired---
Are we hopelessly lost? Sick of it all, somewhat bewildered, and too tired to fight back? We are asked to become more vigilant for anything suspicious looking in order to fight terrorism---really? Is that all it will take? Wars and vicious crimes are rarely won by vigilance---that may stop or derail an act of terror--but it won't stop the next plan or the incentive to keep trying. As these words are written, it has become known that the Boston bombing suspects were two young Russian men with vague and rumored connections to Jihadist organizations. Regardless of the connection, the act was one of terrorism. The two men had gone to school here, one became a U.S. citizen, but we and our way of life were presumably, and if they are found guilty, no match for those who drew them into their circle of religious fervor. It was almost a relief to hear that at least it probably wasn't "one of our own", another mentally ill person, acting out his crazed misery upon us all. Domestic terrorism is harder to bear, as it is home grown, and carries with it our own home grown problems. But at least we can deal with it on our terms.
International terrorism, on the other hand, is a tough enemy to fight---they are all over the world, and now they are here, among us. They despise us and feel there is no greater honor than to die in martyrdom while fighting for their cause. Even our president, Barack Obama, seems overwhelmed at the oncoming waves of unfortunate events---his careful words, in describing the Boston bombing, as anything but terrorism, show a man understandably using great restraint, and perhaps wisdom, but his handling of otherwise obvious cases of terrorism in this country and abroad,( i.e. Fort Hood, Ben Ghazi) together with his "leading from behind' philosophy in other international crises, suggest a certain timidity and weakness, even a reluctance to confront an enemy, naming it for what it is. He has characterized our past mode of operandi as too bullying and aggressive, rather than perhaps a necessarily strong leadership, in a world all too eager to fill a vacuum with their own agendas. Has Obama weakened us with his domestic divisive attitudes, his less than bold presence on the world scene, and his refusal to address the Jihad infiltration problem right here in this country---or made us better, less agitating? Does a kinder, gentler nation stand a chance against religious zealots who do not value life over their beliefs, or power hungry nations who crave dominion over freedom?
We are feeling less secure, as the inevitable spread of religious extremism marches not only into other countries, but into our own, our towns, and murder even our children. It has become very personal, and very deadly. We knew they would come, it was inevitable, only a matter of time---but what to do about it? Should we begin to see that we cannot ignore or allow other countries to become united against us--not even distant Libya, Iraq, Syria or Egypt, some of whose causes seemed just, but whose outcome is dubious? North Korea, on the other hand, is using its own brand of terrorism, as its young leader, Kim Jung Un taunts us with his supposed nuclear capability---he is the biggest bomb of all now, and one wonders where he gets off taking on the United States of America---and getting away with it. We are now negotiating with him via China---blackmail might be a better term. He has been put on the back pages of the media for now, but we shall hear from him again---terror, via nuclear bomb threats in the hands of a young, foolish anti-American autocrat, may become the worst terror of all.
But as we picked up the pieces of another life shattering event last Monday in Boston, the strength and compassion of our people as they rushed into the flames to administer comfort and aid was proof that we don't run from problems---and that when the chips are down, we, the citizens, help our neighbors and ourselves. The people of Boston came through big time with almost instantaneous response. Sick and tired? Not when the chips are down---and it didn't take an act of congress to get help. Our system of law and order worked admirably, bravely, and swiftly--though not without further loss of life, as one officer was killed and another injured. The suspects have been caught and if proven guilty will be brought to justice---life will move along. We will be a little more wary, a little less joyful, and a lot more aware that our lives have changed, along with our country. The land of the free and the home of the brave---seems to be under siege at the moment and perhaps for some time to come. Are we courageous and good enough to remain free, and not intimidated slaves of terroristic blackmail, or some other form of rule or government? The answer remains unknown---but the little boy who died on Monday deserves a better place. He wrote before he died, "Please no more hurting people"---if only it were that easy. And if only the enemy cared---
On Friday, Boston went into complete lock-down mode. One of the suspects was found and shot dead Friday morning. The other brother remained at large, but not for long. Before it was over, stores were closed, ball games cancelled, schools locked and empty, and people told to stay inside their homes. Incredible--- a whole American city brought to its knees by two young men, apparently with a mission to do just that.
Someone said this week that America is being tested---to see what we're made of. Evil has come calling, right here at home---whether it is a religious fanatic, a power lusting foreign leader, or a deranged person out to kill in order to vent his rage---the result is the same, but the former is more dangerous, for its army is invisible, and it's goal is elimination of all who do not believe in their cause and their way of life. It is a creeping, relentless, determined enemy, and though we are not its only target, we are the biggest, and the most reviled. Monday was a grim reminder that they who would harm us are not going away. We are made of many things, and what we were, is not necessarily who we are today. But as we watch our freedoms being slowly chipped away by those who wish to take us down, it remains to be seen who we will become.
President Obama said this week that Americans refuse to be terrorized---talk is cheap, but I liked that, and him for standing strong. If only it were that easy----didn't work for the little boy with the sign. But maybe we are getting sick of being sick and tired---
Monday, February 25, 2013
THE BIG BLUFF---SEQUESTER SCARE!!
Who's bluffing who with the latest political catch word and cliff crisis. Ho hum---wake me when it's over, but here we go again--down the rabbit hole of Washington politics. It's really getting old, this game playing, and should we, the UNITED states of American not be able to do better?? Should our leaders be allowed to get away with this childish finger pointing, and should we continue to be played
like a hapless audience, privy only to what the media decides to tell us, and hear only what our president blasts with his huge microphone, condemning, instead of leading?
"Sequester" is the name, and "squeeze" is the game, according to Mr. Obama who is blatantly employing the old by now scare tactic to bring the Republicans to heel, and the public once again around to his way of thinking--- to keep spending and tax the rich one more time. Put the squeeze on the opposition, play on their emotions of an already fearful, jumpy public, and scare the daylights out of everybody--it goes like this: If the sequester happens, the sky is going to fall, and we will have only the Republicans to blame. The bluff is on, and if the Republicans don't cave this time, on March 1st, we will face major cuts to the tune of $800 billion to both domestic and military programs---the irony is that Obama himself suggested the sequester back in 2012, as a way to force some sort of agreement on the budget crisis. It was his baby---not the Republicans. Or was it his gamble, his bluff, to force the Republicans into submission? After all, something had to be done, and if nothing has been done,
by now, how about we make the punishment so severe that everybody will have to suffer, and the blame once again falls to the Republicans? Perfect.
We've seen it before from Obama, but this time the smell of demagoguery and strong arming the opposition is beginning to look and feel like dirty pool. a set-up, and victory at any cost. The misrepresentation of the facts, and blatant attempt to intimidate and bully the Republicans into submission are hallmarks of a man hell bent on getting his way, regardless of principle or fair tactics. Life and politics aren't always fair, but manipulating and exaggerating the facts are not only beneath the presidency, but dangerous to a democracy which relies on the truth, and a tendency to believe that presidents are above dirty politics. So, March 1st is the deadline---Obama has offered no hint of compromise, insisting on more tax revenue, and the Republicans are showing no signs of folding this time, feeling they have already met the president's demands, having agreed to $620 billion in taxes during the last cliff go round, and that he is once again moving the goal posts, pushing the envelope and them around, by asking for the elimination of tax loopholes and deductions. They have presented two alternative plans to the sequester, which Obama ignored. His proposal mantra is no further taxes equal no further cuts---except, across the board ax cuts, which were his idea. Uh, did you hear me guys? Don't make me do this! I really mean it! And guess who's going to look bad?
So are we headed for the final show down, the really bad, back- breaking cliff? President Obama wants us to think so. He has warned that we will suffer major job losses, weakened military security, children will go hungry, fires will be left to burn, meat to rot, crimes will run rampant, planes may not fly, and on and on. It's beginning to sound like white noise and worse, manipulation. One gets the feeling that Obama has seen the movie "Lincoln" too many times and fancies himself a similar do good crusader---only we're not talking black slavery here. It's about our debt crisis and how to solve it. All who oppose him, chiefly the Republicans, are bad, thoughtless, shallow, and uncaring. It is an absurd argument that all this calamity is even possible under a capable, reasonable government, and ridiculous to blame it all on the opposing party.
It is true, however, that if the sequester goes through, there will changes and there will be pain, but it is highly doubtful that there will be consequences as dramatic as Obama would have us believe. Cuts, after all, do finally have to come, if we are ever to climb out of our debt and begin to balance it. There is plenty of waste in both the military and domestic budgets, and preparations are already being done to deal with less revenue coming in. Adjustments will be made that perhaps should have been made long ago, just as all of us have had to do with our personal finances. And unless everyone panics, compliments of Obama's dire predictions, we will survive. The stock market seems to think so---it's doing just fine, in spite of the president's doom's day proclamations. Perhaps the market knows what we all intrinsically know---bluffs are usually over blown, puffed up threats to produce a desired result----and regardless of the outcome, life and the economy will keep percolating along. Could it be the market place, the barometer of our capitalistic confidence, is stronger than the political voices which are constantly shrieking at our ears, and is having less and less influence?? We could use some of that
confidence.
We are oh so tired of cliffs, crises, bluffs, and threats. We want peace, quiet, reason, and balance again---not one sided governance, dictatorial attitudes, and leaders who speak only in terms of their own self interests and ideologies. There were, after all, almost half of us who voted
against Obama and his policies---should he not realize this, and learn to temper his partisan outbursts? But why change what's not broken? He obviously thrives on chaos and battles, having mastered the art of appearing calm and wise while trying to make others appear obstructive and lost headed?? It seems to be working---Obama is winning at the moment, according to the polls. He stands on the nation's stage and bellows his message of government welfare. It is hard to argue against such things as education, infrastructure, research and development, clean energy, and childhood programs. But at some point, perhaps now, we will have reached a tipping point---who will pay for it all? Obama's believers believe he will find a way---others are convinced he doesn't care, that he is focused on fixing America, not the budget.
The sequester looms large, and either will happen or not. The bluff may not work, and Obama may regret his giving birth to what he wants to avoid---- major cuts, without major tax hikes. But, the bonus is the blame game, so he wins this round either way.
But here's the final hooker, the sting of a sting operation--- and it is much worse than the sequester----are you ready for this? Perhaps it is we who are being bluffed, distracted from the real problem. The debt crisis is so deep and growing at a faster rate than our economic growth at a frail 2%, that neither Obama's proposed tax hikes or the sequester will help much ---medicare, medicaid, and social security are the biggest drains and must be addressed, along with a tax over haul. But no voices are heard for these things---or allowed to be heard over the din of pettiness and politics.
Are we actually believing to spend more is the answer? Or are we simply procrastinating and handing our ills and bills to our children and grandchildren? It all adds up to irresponsible leadership and a trusting public willing to follow. Isn't it time we demand more than political gridlock, campaign style speeches, bluffs, and sequesters---which by the way, the dictionary defines as "to set apart" or "to seclude". Right---we're getting really good at setting aside the hard stuff---or being bluffed.
like a hapless audience, privy only to what the media decides to tell us, and hear only what our president blasts with his huge microphone, condemning, instead of leading?
"Sequester" is the name, and "squeeze" is the game, according to Mr. Obama who is blatantly employing the old by now scare tactic to bring the Republicans to heel, and the public once again around to his way of thinking--- to keep spending and tax the rich one more time. Put the squeeze on the opposition, play on their emotions of an already fearful, jumpy public, and scare the daylights out of everybody--it goes like this: If the sequester happens, the sky is going to fall, and we will have only the Republicans to blame. The bluff is on, and if the Republicans don't cave this time, on March 1st, we will face major cuts to the tune of $800 billion to both domestic and military programs---the irony is that Obama himself suggested the sequester back in 2012, as a way to force some sort of agreement on the budget crisis. It was his baby---not the Republicans. Or was it his gamble, his bluff, to force the Republicans into submission? After all, something had to be done, and if nothing has been done,
by now, how about we make the punishment so severe that everybody will have to suffer, and the blame once again falls to the Republicans? Perfect.
We've seen it before from Obama, but this time the smell of demagoguery and strong arming the opposition is beginning to look and feel like dirty pool. a set-up, and victory at any cost. The misrepresentation of the facts, and blatant attempt to intimidate and bully the Republicans into submission are hallmarks of a man hell bent on getting his way, regardless of principle or fair tactics. Life and politics aren't always fair, but manipulating and exaggerating the facts are not only beneath the presidency, but dangerous to a democracy which relies on the truth, and a tendency to believe that presidents are above dirty politics. So, March 1st is the deadline---Obama has offered no hint of compromise, insisting on more tax revenue, and the Republicans are showing no signs of folding this time, feeling they have already met the president's demands, having agreed to $620 billion in taxes during the last cliff go round, and that he is once again moving the goal posts, pushing the envelope and them around, by asking for the elimination of tax loopholes and deductions. They have presented two alternative plans to the sequester, which Obama ignored. His proposal mantra is no further taxes equal no further cuts---except, across the board ax cuts, which were his idea. Uh, did you hear me guys? Don't make me do this! I really mean it! And guess who's going to look bad?
So are we headed for the final show down, the really bad, back- breaking cliff? President Obama wants us to think so. He has warned that we will suffer major job losses, weakened military security, children will go hungry, fires will be left to burn, meat to rot, crimes will run rampant, planes may not fly, and on and on. It's beginning to sound like white noise and worse, manipulation. One gets the feeling that Obama has seen the movie "Lincoln" too many times and fancies himself a similar do good crusader---only we're not talking black slavery here. It's about our debt crisis and how to solve it. All who oppose him, chiefly the Republicans, are bad, thoughtless, shallow, and uncaring. It is an absurd argument that all this calamity is even possible under a capable, reasonable government, and ridiculous to blame it all on the opposing party.
It is true, however, that if the sequester goes through, there will changes and there will be pain, but it is highly doubtful that there will be consequences as dramatic as Obama would have us believe. Cuts, after all, do finally have to come, if we are ever to climb out of our debt and begin to balance it. There is plenty of waste in both the military and domestic budgets, and preparations are already being done to deal with less revenue coming in. Adjustments will be made that perhaps should have been made long ago, just as all of us have had to do with our personal finances. And unless everyone panics, compliments of Obama's dire predictions, we will survive. The stock market seems to think so---it's doing just fine, in spite of the president's doom's day proclamations. Perhaps the market knows what we all intrinsically know---bluffs are usually over blown, puffed up threats to produce a desired result----and regardless of the outcome, life and the economy will keep percolating along. Could it be the market place, the barometer of our capitalistic confidence, is stronger than the political voices which are constantly shrieking at our ears, and is having less and less influence?? We could use some of that
confidence.
We are oh so tired of cliffs, crises, bluffs, and threats. We want peace, quiet, reason, and balance again---not one sided governance, dictatorial attitudes, and leaders who speak only in terms of their own self interests and ideologies. There were, after all, almost half of us who voted
against Obama and his policies---should he not realize this, and learn to temper his partisan outbursts? But why change what's not broken? He obviously thrives on chaos and battles, having mastered the art of appearing calm and wise while trying to make others appear obstructive and lost headed?? It seems to be working---Obama is winning at the moment, according to the polls. He stands on the nation's stage and bellows his message of government welfare. It is hard to argue against such things as education, infrastructure, research and development, clean energy, and childhood programs. But at some point, perhaps now, we will have reached a tipping point---who will pay for it all? Obama's believers believe he will find a way---others are convinced he doesn't care, that he is focused on fixing America, not the budget.
The sequester looms large, and either will happen or not. The bluff may not work, and Obama may regret his giving birth to what he wants to avoid---- major cuts, without major tax hikes. But, the bonus is the blame game, so he wins this round either way.
But here's the final hooker, the sting of a sting operation--- and it is much worse than the sequester----are you ready for this? Perhaps it is we who are being bluffed, distracted from the real problem. The debt crisis is so deep and growing at a faster rate than our economic growth at a frail 2%, that neither Obama's proposed tax hikes or the sequester will help much ---medicare, medicaid, and social security are the biggest drains and must be addressed, along with a tax over haul. But no voices are heard for these things---or allowed to be heard over the din of pettiness and politics.
Are we actually believing to spend more is the answer? Or are we simply procrastinating and handing our ills and bills to our children and grandchildren? It all adds up to irresponsible leadership and a trusting public willing to follow. Isn't it time we demand more than political gridlock, campaign style speeches, bluffs, and sequesters---which by the way, the dictionary defines as "to set apart" or "to seclude". Right---we're getting really good at setting aside the hard stuff---or being bluffed.
Friday, January 18, 2013
TELL ME A STORY
Do you ever imagine that hundreds of years from now people will be reading about us? We're living our story, and it's a real cliff hanger, wouldn't you say? Well, we got there , to the very edge ----brakes squeeling, stock markets teetering, the American people joking about what a sick joke this all was--- congressmen looking ever so important with the weight of the world on their shoulders as they filed past the reporters to announce the long awaited decision---financial crisis averted for now. Ah, c'mon, you knew it all along, it was just a matter of time, of Obama refusing to deal, then flexing his presidential muscles at Boehner, and finally taunting him and the Republicans into caving to the inevitable It was a circus, a show, a shameless example of our leaders at work and political theatre enough to make you want to gag. But they got 'er done, and uh,---what exactly was that?? Very little, unless you consider power plays and ideological gamesmanship more important than the actual underwhelming "compromise" hammered out at the 11th hour by none other our favorite uncle,Vice Pres. Joe Biden and John Boehner, the beleagured Republican Speaker of the House . Our story continues, but who's doing the telling? And are we merely characters in the story, or are we helping to write it?? President Obama is fond of saying he just needs to tell the story better, improve the narrative.
How very patronizing---as if we are merely onlookers, incapable of perception-- and need his spinning tale to be captivated.
What does it say about our president that he had to call in his v.p. to do his last ditch cliff negotiating? It screams that Obama doesn't negotiate, never had any intention of doing so---he negotiates by not negotiating, because he didn't have to, obviously doesn't know how to, and genuinely doesn't like compromise. He takes on all comers pretty much the same--- petulant and angry if he doesn't get his way, and mean and threatening even as he's winning. It 's my way of the highway, guys, 'cause I'm right, and not only are you wrong, you are losers. You and your party are going down---the election told me so, I've got the wind at my back, and have no intention of serving down the middle and catering to anyone who disagrees with me---transformational, isn't it? Never did like the two party system---it gets in my way, and then I have to use my excecutive privilege, which is pretty cool, and much less messy. But hey, I'm the main character here, in fact I'm writing much of the story, and I shall do what I please---turn the page.
What you say? Obama gave a little---yes, he did---he raised his stretch-ey definition of"millionaire" to those making $500,000 a year, instead of $250,000.00 ----but the Republicans sold their souls, caved on he one thing they promised never to do, and got very little in return. The point is, this was more of a philosphocal fight than a solution, and Obama wins that one, based on sheer numbers of an electorate that was either conned or prefers to believe in a fairy tale. It goes like this-- The rich should pay more, even if it doesn't help all that much---they have much too much, makes us all feel better to take some, gotta help a little, and relieves us of having to tackle the harder issue. The real problem, spending, was hardly debated, let a lone a few entitlements that may not even get enacted. But on that point, Obama balked, and warned that any further talks re entitlement spending will not sit well with him--- "that's not the way it's going to work"---not only did he sound once again like the stern patriarch in charge, but he seems unconcerned about spending money till the cows come home as long as it contributes to his idea of re-tailoring this country to his view, which is looking more and more like a welfare state. But never mind---he wins for now. He is a great story teller and has a gift for persuading readers to see things his way---to lull, charm, and believe. The plot thickens---
Now, as people are realizing that their payroll checks are a bit less, due to the fact that Obama did not extend the cut he had instigated in 2010, they are wondering what happened---there wasn't much mention of that during all the cliff talks. There will surely be more little surprises as Obamacare kicks in. Insurance companies are already raising premium prices. The whole picture is not looking that much better. Yes, these things take time, but transformation can happen very quickly under a president that does not value the role of a two party system, balance, and due process of legislation. How much time do we have before we look up one day, and realize that where we were wasn't so bad---and where we are isn't so good. Already we are hearing that the middle class will surely feel the pain and perhaps the brunt of our economic load---tax the rich more?? That's the fairy tale part---sorry, but when we're spending more than we make, there simply isn't enough to
go around anymore. But never mind, we are moving forward to the next exciting chapter---
The really big issue of the national debt, its ceiling and whether to raise it looms large and the two sides are squaring off again---- the Republicans demanding that entitlement cuts be part of the final deal, and the president stating unequivocally that will not be the case. Adding fuel to the fire, President O. made his usual TV appearance, using his bully pulpit to shame and bully the Republicans into submission by warning that not to raise the ceiling his way, i.e. without major cuts, will be irresponsible and absurd, never mind that he is responsible for the largest debt increase in history and seems oblivious to addressing our economic free fall---and well, you get it boys, I'm wearing the white hat, here, and you might as well ride on outta town---don't forget your hats, the black ones. Does this kind of blatant partisanship make anyone else squirm just a little?? What next? An executive order to raise the debt ceiling? It would be nice, even leader- like, and certainly legacy engendering if perhaps just this once President Obama would choose to act as a mediator between two differing philosophies, instead of the benign, but intractable dictator he seems to favor---and to back off just a bit. Sometimes being "right" isn't always the right way to lead--it begets resentment and smacks of assumed omnipotence. Trust me, says the story teller, I was sent here to write big things---go big, or go home is my motto. But does he have to paint everyone else as small???
So what's the answer to our disappearing two party system, our bulwark against the power of one philosophy radically changing the country? It would be nice if conservatives/Republicans could be counted on to stand firm against the crumbling walls of a once sustainable economy and a country envied far and wide for its opportunity for all who were willing to work for it, and a beacon of freedom. But they won't because they can't---the media/public pressure too great, the fairy tale too seductive, the people too willing, and the price too politically high. No, unless Mr. Boehner and posse become Braveheart and decide to speak their party's truth to power, we are witnessing the dissolution of the Republican party---and more, the possible transformation of our country into a welfare state faster than you can say" constitution". Don't even think about the constitution, says the yarn master---my story is much more relevant to today---follow me, we're almost there.
Perhaps the GOP must, as some suggest, transform themselves---maybe their story simply doesn't click anymore. The country has turned left, and right isn't right anymore. But wait!!??---stop the press, the story we're being told, the narrative being spun----could it be possible that we're being more misled than enlightened and progressful? Has the great and clever Democrat machine and the mostly biased media managed to mischaracterize and misconstrue the Republican party's values, done a phenomenal job of telling us a story that is based more on emotion and spin than fact? "Look", as the politicians like to say, look at it clearly, or at least differently,-- could this be a case of mistaken or perverted identity, even in fact, not the real story??
But meanwhile, as a back story, suppose for a moment that the Republican party in actuality is the one who: Has the bigger, more inclusive tent, who respects all men/women regardless of background, lineage, creed or faith, NOT the party who succeeds by keeping people down instead of encouraging them to get up; Promotes self reliance and belief in the individual, so that everyone can find their own strength, NOT the nanny government as a crutch and panacea for all ills; Is not devoid of compassion, but is convinced that a conservative approach to government that exists to help, but not hinder, is truly for the larger good, NOT one which dominates and weakens it's people and its economy by its emphasis on taxes, recipiency and entitlement; They are not all gun crazy enthusiasts and anti-abortionists, BUT they do believe in the second amendment, and the sacredness of life. They are not all Christians, Jews, Muslims, or atheists---they are all those things, and more, BUT they do not mock or disrespect anyone, while pretending to be the party of tolerance. And finally that this is a party who still believes in the American Dream, where all who wish and work hard can be part of the success story, NOT the seductive fairy tale of an Utopia where everyone has their fair share, but no one has too much---except of course, those in power, the ones who weave the tale of class warfare, they vs. us, and a government so big and so caring that nobody has to worry about anything---and they all lived happily ever after. End of story.
Or pick up a different book---Once upon a time there was a country where everyone wanted to live, they came from all over, and all was good for a while, until one day, the country could no longer support everyone or pay its bills, the people began to grumble, the social safety nets began to shred, the taxes, though huge, were no longer enough to sustain the national debt, or supply for all the needs of the public good, the president and congress kept spending, and scolded anyone who disagreed with them, calling them irresponsible and absurd. Not wishing to be thought of as irresponsible and absurd, those who disagreed retreated, thinking they would live to fight another day. But the other day never came---the country fell into disrepair, and -----there were much fewer rich people, many more poor people, not enough jobs, poor quality and limited medical care, reduced help for the poor and sick,----the dream had died, and what was left was only a memory of what once was. Until someone, not necessarily a Republican or a Democrat, or even one person--but many with great vision, wisdom, and courage, one day stood up and said with one voice----enough. This story isn't us, man! Our real story, the one our grandchildren will read about, belongs to all of us, not one party, a president, or even his Vice. Listen up--we are the story, and we can write our own ending, or our new beginning. Now is the time----get involved.
How very patronizing---as if we are merely onlookers, incapable of perception-- and need his spinning tale to be captivated.
What does it say about our president that he had to call in his v.p. to do his last ditch cliff negotiating? It screams that Obama doesn't negotiate, never had any intention of doing so---he negotiates by not negotiating, because he didn't have to, obviously doesn't know how to, and genuinely doesn't like compromise. He takes on all comers pretty much the same--- petulant and angry if he doesn't get his way, and mean and threatening even as he's winning. It 's my way of the highway, guys, 'cause I'm right, and not only are you wrong, you are losers. You and your party are going down---the election told me so, I've got the wind at my back, and have no intention of serving down the middle and catering to anyone who disagrees with me---transformational, isn't it? Never did like the two party system---it gets in my way, and then I have to use my excecutive privilege, which is pretty cool, and much less messy. But hey, I'm the main character here, in fact I'm writing much of the story, and I shall do what I please---turn the page.
What you say? Obama gave a little---yes, he did---he raised his stretch-ey definition of"millionaire" to those making $500,000 a year, instead of $250,000.00 ----but the Republicans sold their souls, caved on he one thing they promised never to do, and got very little in return. The point is, this was more of a philosphocal fight than a solution, and Obama wins that one, based on sheer numbers of an electorate that was either conned or prefers to believe in a fairy tale. It goes like this-- The rich should pay more, even if it doesn't help all that much---they have much too much, makes us all feel better to take some, gotta help a little, and relieves us of having to tackle the harder issue. The real problem, spending, was hardly debated, let a lone a few entitlements that may not even get enacted. But on that point, Obama balked, and warned that any further talks re entitlement spending will not sit well with him--- "that's not the way it's going to work"---not only did he sound once again like the stern patriarch in charge, but he seems unconcerned about spending money till the cows come home as long as it contributes to his idea of re-tailoring this country to his view, which is looking more and more like a welfare state. But never mind---he wins for now. He is a great story teller and has a gift for persuading readers to see things his way---to lull, charm, and believe. The plot thickens---
Now, as people are realizing that their payroll checks are a bit less, due to the fact that Obama did not extend the cut he had instigated in 2010, they are wondering what happened---there wasn't much mention of that during all the cliff talks. There will surely be more little surprises as Obamacare kicks in. Insurance companies are already raising premium prices. The whole picture is not looking that much better. Yes, these things take time, but transformation can happen very quickly under a president that does not value the role of a two party system, balance, and due process of legislation. How much time do we have before we look up one day, and realize that where we were wasn't so bad---and where we are isn't so good. Already we are hearing that the middle class will surely feel the pain and perhaps the brunt of our economic load---tax the rich more?? That's the fairy tale part---sorry, but when we're spending more than we make, there simply isn't enough to
go around anymore. But never mind, we are moving forward to the next exciting chapter---
The really big issue of the national debt, its ceiling and whether to raise it looms large and the two sides are squaring off again---- the Republicans demanding that entitlement cuts be part of the final deal, and the president stating unequivocally that will not be the case. Adding fuel to the fire, President O. made his usual TV appearance, using his bully pulpit to shame and bully the Republicans into submission by warning that not to raise the ceiling his way, i.e. without major cuts, will be irresponsible and absurd, never mind that he is responsible for the largest debt increase in history and seems oblivious to addressing our economic free fall---and well, you get it boys, I'm wearing the white hat, here, and you might as well ride on outta town---don't forget your hats, the black ones. Does this kind of blatant partisanship make anyone else squirm just a little?? What next? An executive order to raise the debt ceiling? It would be nice, even leader- like, and certainly legacy engendering if perhaps just this once President Obama would choose to act as a mediator between two differing philosophies, instead of the benign, but intractable dictator he seems to favor---and to back off just a bit. Sometimes being "right" isn't always the right way to lead--it begets resentment and smacks of assumed omnipotence. Trust me, says the story teller, I was sent here to write big things---go big, or go home is my motto. But does he have to paint everyone else as small???
So what's the answer to our disappearing two party system, our bulwark against the power of one philosophy radically changing the country? It would be nice if conservatives/Republicans could be counted on to stand firm against the crumbling walls of a once sustainable economy and a country envied far and wide for its opportunity for all who were willing to work for it, and a beacon of freedom. But they won't because they can't---the media/public pressure too great, the fairy tale too seductive, the people too willing, and the price too politically high. No, unless Mr. Boehner and posse become Braveheart and decide to speak their party's truth to power, we are witnessing the dissolution of the Republican party---and more, the possible transformation of our country into a welfare state faster than you can say" constitution". Don't even think about the constitution, says the yarn master---my story is much more relevant to today---follow me, we're almost there.
Perhaps the GOP must, as some suggest, transform themselves---maybe their story simply doesn't click anymore. The country has turned left, and right isn't right anymore. But wait!!??---stop the press, the story we're being told, the narrative being spun----could it be possible that we're being more misled than enlightened and progressful? Has the great and clever Democrat machine and the mostly biased media managed to mischaracterize and misconstrue the Republican party's values, done a phenomenal job of telling us a story that is based more on emotion and spin than fact? "Look", as the politicians like to say, look at it clearly, or at least differently,-- could this be a case of mistaken or perverted identity, even in fact, not the real story??
But meanwhile, as a back story, suppose for a moment that the Republican party in actuality is the one who: Has the bigger, more inclusive tent, who respects all men/women regardless of background, lineage, creed or faith, NOT the party who succeeds by keeping people down instead of encouraging them to get up; Promotes self reliance and belief in the individual, so that everyone can find their own strength, NOT the nanny government as a crutch and panacea for all ills; Is not devoid of compassion, but is convinced that a conservative approach to government that exists to help, but not hinder, is truly for the larger good, NOT one which dominates and weakens it's people and its economy by its emphasis on taxes, recipiency and entitlement; They are not all gun crazy enthusiasts and anti-abortionists, BUT they do believe in the second amendment, and the sacredness of life. They are not all Christians, Jews, Muslims, or atheists---they are all those things, and more, BUT they do not mock or disrespect anyone, while pretending to be the party of tolerance. And finally that this is a party who still believes in the American Dream, where all who wish and work hard can be part of the success story, NOT the seductive fairy tale of an Utopia where everyone has their fair share, but no one has too much---except of course, those in power, the ones who weave the tale of class warfare, they vs. us, and a government so big and so caring that nobody has to worry about anything---and they all lived happily ever after. End of story.
Or pick up a different book---Once upon a time there was a country where everyone wanted to live, they came from all over, and all was good for a while, until one day, the country could no longer support everyone or pay its bills, the people began to grumble, the social safety nets began to shred, the taxes, though huge, were no longer enough to sustain the national debt, or supply for all the needs of the public good, the president and congress kept spending, and scolded anyone who disagreed with them, calling them irresponsible and absurd. Not wishing to be thought of as irresponsible and absurd, those who disagreed retreated, thinking they would live to fight another day. But the other day never came---the country fell into disrepair, and -----there were much fewer rich people, many more poor people, not enough jobs, poor quality and limited medical care, reduced help for the poor and sick,----the dream had died, and what was left was only a memory of what once was. Until someone, not necessarily a Republican or a Democrat, or even one person--but many with great vision, wisdom, and courage, one day stood up and said with one voice----enough. This story isn't us, man! Our real story, the one our grandchildren will read about, belongs to all of us, not one party, a president, or even his Vice. Listen up--we are the story, and we can write our own ending, or our new beginning. Now is the time----get involved.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
ARE WE THERE YET???
If President Obama were a corporate CEO selling and negotiating a deal for his company, he'd be laughed out of the board room about now. But he's not, and nobody's laughing. John Boehner, speaker of the House, may in fact, be weeping. Not only did Obama turn down the Republican's recent proposal, he called it not even "serious" enough to consider discussing. The proposal actually seemed quite serious---it offered 800 billion in tax revenue to be gained through loopholes by the rich. And it proposed another 600 billion in cuts to federal health programs. It was made in good faith, and turned down flat by a president who is evidently going to accept nothing less than his way, which is that negotiations can only begin, it at all, by demanding that anyone making $250.000.00,( $200,000.00 for individuals) and over must pay "their fair share". Period. End of discussion. This is not compromising--it's bullying, and stunning in its nakedness. Even the Dems must be at least slightly embarrased at this man's arrogance and refusal to grant a reply and modicum of respect to the Republican leader.
But that's where we presently are, and the Republicans, maybe not serious enough for the president, are so not amused. Either they agree to Obama's insistence on taxing those making over 250 thou a year, or face the prospect of everybody's taxes going up and huge cuts to the military and domestic programs, i.e., over the cliff. There seems to be no middle ground. It's a lose, lose proposition because the president holds the winning hand, and he's not about to fold it. It's all about taxing the rich, if you can call $ 250,000 rich, and unless that demand is met, he is willing to let us all go under, or over in this case This would make sense, if taxing the top money makers were really the magic bullet that would solve our problems---but it isn't, as it will only make a small contribution to the revenue. Obama has to know this, he has surely done the math--- but it's both his hubris and his driving ambition to accomplish his greatest idealogical goal---to "spread the wealth", and the key to that is to hold high the banner of class warfare, no matter the cost to the country. It matters not to him that the rich can't save us from excessive over spending and ever increasing debt---only that we must blame them and change the national mode of operandus from one of making it, to that of taking it. That's the plan, the vision, the transformation of America, and he's sticking to it---got that John Boehner? You are between a rock and a hard place-- the prez doesn't want to negotiate with you, because he thinks he doesn't have to, and humiliating you is much more fun.
At this point in time, Boehner must be pulling his hair out, but he has presented yet two more proposals to the White House---and to the chagrin of his more conservative party members, is starting to fold on the tax issue, but holding out for at least some semblance of compromise, otherwise known as cuts in spending. Speaking of cuts, we don't know what cuts, if any, Obama would approve, even if he gets his way on the taxes. Everybody knows that Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are the elephants in the room, but are rarely mentioned anymore, at least not publically, and especially not from the Obama camp. Revenue is the goal, not cuts. That's the grand bargain. What he wants is an extra 1.5 trillion, which is twice what he had originally requested from Boehner last summer and didn't get. Spite may not be Obama's game, but hard ball is. Don't expect much in the wayof substantial cuts--that would be compromising.
Like Charlie Sheen once said, he is "winning", and there's no reason to bend. Charlie Sheen, however, finally saw, if not the error of his ways, that the public was not behind him. He lost his job, and his fan base. Now, we know that Obama is certainly no Charlie Sheen, but he might want to consider that there is more to winning than getting your own way in a so called democracy, without something called balance--- a nice concept he likes to talk about, but for which he shows little regard, even asking for congress to grant him control over the debt ceiling without congressional approval!! His contempt for anything other than his way is palatable, and his march towards transforming this country is relentless. It seems all road blocks are disappearing like dominoes. Welcome to the outskirts of Obamaville---where once upon a time a country gave its self to a man they barely knew, and trusted him to lead them out of the wilderness. Only he really didn't know the way back--only forward to a different kind of America.
The Republicans and the conservative philosophy believe that true revenue comes not from more and more taxation, but from a healthy, thriving economy, where jobs are plentiful, reasonable taxes flow from that income, and the sky's the limit to fulfilling one's potential, leaving behind the idea that we must rely on others for our well being, and that we can indeed pursue our own happiness. The social responsiblities multiply too, because the revenue from more of those who can work provide for a larger safety net, instead of soaking the "wealthiest among us".
But sadly, the Republicans are not even talking about that now---they are retreating, caving, because they have not been able to sell this once attractive idea----they need a better marketing scheme, and much better sales people. John Boehner looks like a light weight compared to Obama, the Tyson of class warfare, and perhaps the best political salesman we've ever seen, except he has no class. He fights dirty, keeps changing his demands, and upping the ante.
But here's the thing, the really paradigm changing thing---what he's selling, i.e. big daddy government, more benefits for all, and stick it to the rich seems to be the latest, hippest, trend. It sells like Jeans and t-shirts---some really can't afford anything else, but many more just want to look that way, because it's cool and progressive. Republicans seem almost old fashioned with their message of jobs, prosperity, and dreaming big---and may be losing the battle. Are we witnessing the demise of the two party system?
One has to wonder---is that what Obama and company want? To destroy? To deny common courtesy and dignity to the Republicans by calling their offers and any conversations of cuts not serious enough to consider,so that the Republican brand is seen as over, out dated, no longer worthy of even a discussion? Is that fair and balanced, and is Obamaville, like Obamacare, going to ultimately engender more resentment than acceptance, as we realize we had very little to say about it? But isn't that what elections are all about, and didn't we---? Yes, we did--- some of us.
Time and history have a way of sorting things out, and sometimes the best way to get through trouble is simply to walk through it no matter the hazards or the price. The Republicans, led by John Boehner and his constituents must decide. whether to stand down, or stand up to their principles. They must also start searching for future leaders of their party--someone who can inspire and sell the party's vision of an America that is much more than a welfare state, and still capable of being the land of opportunity and dreams, where anything is possible. Is anybody listening? Or do those who believe in such things number only in the minority? If that be the case, then again, welcome to "Obamaville"---the land of over-sized government, smaller lives, fewer liberties, and no big dreams. We're almost there---send in the clowns. The Republicans died along the way.
It's too bad the American public can't be privvy to the private conversations going on behind closed doors between Boehner and Obama---they might very well see what we're instinctively perceiving---that often the best pitch man isn't necessarily selling the best idea. He just holds the bigger stick.
But that's where we presently are, and the Republicans, maybe not serious enough for the president, are so not amused. Either they agree to Obama's insistence on taxing those making over 250 thou a year, or face the prospect of everybody's taxes going up and huge cuts to the military and domestic programs, i.e., over the cliff. There seems to be no middle ground. It's a lose, lose proposition because the president holds the winning hand, and he's not about to fold it. It's all about taxing the rich, if you can call $ 250,000 rich, and unless that demand is met, he is willing to let us all go under, or over in this case This would make sense, if taxing the top money makers were really the magic bullet that would solve our problems---but it isn't, as it will only make a small contribution to the revenue. Obama has to know this, he has surely done the math--- but it's both his hubris and his driving ambition to accomplish his greatest idealogical goal---to "spread the wealth", and the key to that is to hold high the banner of class warfare, no matter the cost to the country. It matters not to him that the rich can't save us from excessive over spending and ever increasing debt---only that we must blame them and change the national mode of operandus from one of making it, to that of taking it. That's the plan, the vision, the transformation of America, and he's sticking to it---got that John Boehner? You are between a rock and a hard place-- the prez doesn't want to negotiate with you, because he thinks he doesn't have to, and humiliating you is much more fun.
At this point in time, Boehner must be pulling his hair out, but he has presented yet two more proposals to the White House---and to the chagrin of his more conservative party members, is starting to fold on the tax issue, but holding out for at least some semblance of compromise, otherwise known as cuts in spending. Speaking of cuts, we don't know what cuts, if any, Obama would approve, even if he gets his way on the taxes. Everybody knows that Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are the elephants in the room, but are rarely mentioned anymore, at least not publically, and especially not from the Obama camp. Revenue is the goal, not cuts. That's the grand bargain. What he wants is an extra 1.5 trillion, which is twice what he had originally requested from Boehner last summer and didn't get. Spite may not be Obama's game, but hard ball is. Don't expect much in the wayof substantial cuts--that would be compromising.
Like Charlie Sheen once said, he is "winning", and there's no reason to bend. Charlie Sheen, however, finally saw, if not the error of his ways, that the public was not behind him. He lost his job, and his fan base. Now, we know that Obama is certainly no Charlie Sheen, but he might want to consider that there is more to winning than getting your own way in a so called democracy, without something called balance--- a nice concept he likes to talk about, but for which he shows little regard, even asking for congress to grant him control over the debt ceiling without congressional approval!! His contempt for anything other than his way is palatable, and his march towards transforming this country is relentless. It seems all road blocks are disappearing like dominoes. Welcome to the outskirts of Obamaville---where once upon a time a country gave its self to a man they barely knew, and trusted him to lead them out of the wilderness. Only he really didn't know the way back--only forward to a different kind of America.
The Republicans and the conservative philosophy believe that true revenue comes not from more and more taxation, but from a healthy, thriving economy, where jobs are plentiful, reasonable taxes flow from that income, and the sky's the limit to fulfilling one's potential, leaving behind the idea that we must rely on others for our well being, and that we can indeed pursue our own happiness. The social responsiblities multiply too, because the revenue from more of those who can work provide for a larger safety net, instead of soaking the "wealthiest among us".
But sadly, the Republicans are not even talking about that now---they are retreating, caving, because they have not been able to sell this once attractive idea----they need a better marketing scheme, and much better sales people. John Boehner looks like a light weight compared to Obama, the Tyson of class warfare, and perhaps the best political salesman we've ever seen, except he has no class. He fights dirty, keeps changing his demands, and upping the ante.
But here's the thing, the really paradigm changing thing---what he's selling, i.e. big daddy government, more benefits for all, and stick it to the rich seems to be the latest, hippest, trend. It sells like Jeans and t-shirts---some really can't afford anything else, but many more just want to look that way, because it's cool and progressive. Republicans seem almost old fashioned with their message of jobs, prosperity, and dreaming big---and may be losing the battle. Are we witnessing the demise of the two party system?
One has to wonder---is that what Obama and company want? To destroy? To deny common courtesy and dignity to the Republicans by calling their offers and any conversations of cuts not serious enough to consider,so that the Republican brand is seen as over, out dated, no longer worthy of even a discussion? Is that fair and balanced, and is Obamaville, like Obamacare, going to ultimately engender more resentment than acceptance, as we realize we had very little to say about it? But isn't that what elections are all about, and didn't we---? Yes, we did--- some of us.
Time and history have a way of sorting things out, and sometimes the best way to get through trouble is simply to walk through it no matter the hazards or the price. The Republicans, led by John Boehner and his constituents must decide. whether to stand down, or stand up to their principles. They must also start searching for future leaders of their party--someone who can inspire and sell the party's vision of an America that is much more than a welfare state, and still capable of being the land of opportunity and dreams, where anything is possible. Is anybody listening? Or do those who believe in such things number only in the minority? If that be the case, then again, welcome to "Obamaville"---the land of over-sized government, smaller lives, fewer liberties, and no big dreams. We're almost there---send in the clowns. The Republicans died along the way.
It's too bad the American public can't be privvy to the private conversations going on behind closed doors between Boehner and Obama---they might very well see what we're instinctively perceiving---that often the best pitch man isn't necessarily selling the best idea. He just holds the bigger stick.
Monday, November 19, 2012
FORWARD, MARCH----
If by some chance you didn't notice, the election is over and we move----"forward". Is everybody happy? I have a friend who says she is going to "expunge" the word "forward" from her vocabulary. Another friend when asked how he felt two days after the election said simply,"Sad".Others just shook their heads in despair, as if much more than the election had been lost. Of course, these were all folks from the conservative persuasion. There must have been joy and jubilation elsewhere, even smug satisfaction. But it wasn't obvious---even Obama had the good sense not to gloat in his acceptance speech. After all, he had not exactly received a standing ovation, or even close to a mandate. The people seemed to have given him their permission to continue, to keep trying till he gets it right, but certainly not their ringing endorsement. The congress remained filled with those who disagree vehemently,boding future gridlock.
And as Romney, the man who could have been president, and perhaps should have been, given the evidence at hand, walked off the world stage, one could not help but wonder---what had happened here? This was a man who seemingly had everything going for him---against an encumbent who had very little. The latter, with few exceptions, had only a worried, stressed country who had drifted even further into a recession after he took office, despite his efforts and policies. Nothing seemed to have worked enough to pull us out at a normal rate of recovery. Though there are faint signs, a slight uptick in employment, a sputtering housing re-start, some new manufacturing, but we still seem to be on life support. Nevertheless, a majority of the American people, voted once again for Obama and not for the man who could have given us a fresh start, new hope, and a different vision. But why didn't we take what he had to offer?
Never presume the American mind, much less his/her vote.. The afore mentioned evidence may have been considered, but in the end, what mattered more was their gut instinct based not necessarily on the evidence, but on well, ---that's still up for conjecture and the subject for endless analysis by the pundits and especially the Republicans. But let's give it a try in a moment. Regardless the reasons, this was a major blow for the grand old party---and very possibly reason enough for deep soul searching and a major over haul to their party platforms. But was it really a vote against Romney that caused Obama to win? Or were there other factors at play here?? First, there was Obama, himself--- not so much the president, but the candidate, and one who knows how to win-----nobody does it better.
Obama was never one to sit back and allow the election process to take care of itself---he was a campaigning machine, covering mega miles and raising more money than any other Dem candidate. This was his turf,and he determined to keep it. It was also his forte, what he does best---sell the people not on his failures, but on him---the guy they love to love. He charmed, he entertained, he showed up everywhere where he thought it counted, even snubbing a United Nations meeting, for a larger venue , a TV talk show,"The View." He played it nice, he played it dirty, and he played it Chicago smart---tough. His strategy was not one of proud accomplishments, but one of attack---the only card left for him to play. And he did it brilliantly, using the latest data technology, to target the moving polls, and somehow turning Romney, the squeaky clean man with no dirty laundry into an unsavory business tycoon, with no heart, no conscience, and no chance against the relentless negative ads. For those of you who think negative ads don't work---observe that they did work very well. David Axelrod, Obama's main campaign manager, should also be given dubious credit for designing a very crafty campaign to deconstruct what was, indeed, a formidable opponent. in Mr. Romney. They took no prisoners, and no heed against those who preached against negativity.This was war, and they intended to win---mission accomplished.
Now, let's look at Mitt Romney---he may have been his own worst enemy. Try as he might, he just didn't seem to have the guts for politics---he refused or didn't know how to fight back hard enough, to rebuke the character smearing, the twisted charges leveled against him. Contrary to spin, he wasn't so much a "flip flopper" as a man who changed with the times and the people he governed. He certainly was not a greedy business destroyer, but a savvy entrepenuer who knew how to rescue businesses, thereby saving many jobs. The nail in the coffin was his remark, taken out of context, about the 47% who he said were not worth going after---he meant that no matter what he did, he would not win their hearts or their vote. He was exactly right---but he did not mean, as spun by the media and Obama, that he had no compassion for them. His life and past history are testament of a person who cares for others. He was and is a good and capable man, but this was not his time. nor his country to lead. Perhaps he never was, as the Republican establishment supposedly never fully supported him---word was he was too moderate, not right enough. Three million registered Republicans chose not to vote for him---how bizarre, as though the answer would have been a more right wing candidate. What world are they living in? More " right" wasn't what they needed. What they needed was more fight, light, and a distress call against what was happening---the country was failing under Obama's leadership, or lack thereof. And let's be honest, what the Republicans also lacked was a more inclusive tone, one that spoke more directly to the Black and Hispanic communities, and to the minorities in general. The Womens' vote may have also been an issue, but was mostly a hyped up last ditch effort by the Obama campaign---many of us women maintain that we are far more interested in larger issues, than free condums and abortion laws, which are already pretty much set in stone, and not likely to be challenged; and it was somewhat unsettling to be used as a campaign booster. Perhaps like Sesame Street and Big Bird, we should have protested.
And finally there was us, the American people, perhaps so traumatized by our failing economy and concern over the future, that we found ourselves coming a bit undone and not at all sure of who or what we wanted. We are no longer united with similar values and sense of pride in our country. We are polarized to the point of paralysis, and our once great confidence is changing to doubt and fear of the future. The election was a tug of war between economic concerns and social issues----and that was at the core of Obama's tactical win. He had built his own army by inducing and encouraging class warfare; and Romney and his campaign could not fight the battle of social issues and responsibility with only a recipe for a healthier economy. Never mind that a healthier economy could have been the one thing, perhaps the only antidote, that could bolster and even save our social safety nets---the people didn't see it that way, at least not enough of them.
Mr. Romney tried his best to tell us that, but he was drowned out by mis-charaterization and ridicule---except for one exceptional night, during the first presidential debate, when we saw two men, one very strong, knowledgeable, in control, sure footed and presidential. Obama, on the other hand, was strangely off balance, cut loose from his teleprompter comfort zone, out of his depth, not on his game. Who was the real leader? But we would not see this glimpse of either man again. Obama came back strong, and Romney seemed to lose his mojo and grow weary of the whole impossible thing of fighting an opponent who had what he would never have--- cool charisma, and the emotionally charged, but still effective weapon of Robin Hood---the blame the rich bomb. Romney needed to get angry and fight back, to contest that the rich are not the problem--but that wasn't in his DNA---he was a fix- it guy, not a warrior.
There is talk that we may have seen the demise of the Republican party---that it is out dated, and that it no longer appeals to the majority of the country. We are changing, and it remains to be seen to what---minorities and their needs are growing, the middle class feels weakened, and the wealthy threatened by a rising tide of resentment. Unless the Republicans and their conservative approach to government can convince enough people that their way of thinking, that is, that smaller government is better for everybody, than big government., that the road to more prosperity is not through more taxation, but through a robust economy where everyone is employed , and that dependence on the nipple of government is ultimately a surrender to finding our own strengths and a sacrifice of our freedoms---if they fail to do that, they may have, indeed, lost more than an election.
And one wonders if the vast majority realizes that---or do they no longer care? Are they less interested in what they can do, and more in what can be done for them? Are the social issues so touted during the campaign more important than anything else? It would appear that many thought so, and Obama banked on it. Romney gambled on the promise of jobs, pay checks, self esteem, liberties, independence, a stronger military and country. Yes, important also are better health care, education opportunities for more, higher wages, infrastructure, research investment, a brighter future for our children---all good things, and certainly not limited to the bucket lists of liberals. But that was the way it was presented by Obama and crew, and Romney failed to tell it like it is---that it all costs money, and at the moment we're broke, and need to fix our engine first above all else. It is true that we cannot be truly a great nation without compassion and duty to the less fortunate among us. And perhaps we are only as good as our deeds to correct the imbalance of poor vs. rich. But what isn't true, what obliterates better solutions, is that the rich are the culprits ---and that they must be chastised, demonized, and made to feel guilty. We are a mixed bag, even within our parties, of social vs. economic ideals, and neither party owns nor has all the answers---but we are not the enemy of each other.
That's the big lie, and one the Republicans have to expose and then re-tailor their message . Because, though it was and is the economy," stupid", it's not completely all about the economy. News flash---most all of us care for others and value our social safety nets ---the difference is that the conservative philosophy believes that the best way to offer and sustain helpful programs is to have an economy that can actually afford and support them. It is a pragmatic approach, however, and pragmatism doesn't sell as well as emotionalism. Getting that message across is difficult when the other side insists it is the grandmother being pushed off the cliff by the evil conservative who only cares for himself. It would be funny, if it weren't so patently absurd---would you call your doctor, the one who advises giving you life saving medicine, evil? Or would you, instead, answer the call of those who choose to ignore the warning signs, and continue on the same path? Like I said, negative ads sell. Get used to it---also get used to the fact that money and large contributions are part of the election process. Not going to change, unless free speech is removed from the campaigns.
Elections, second chances, and dire circumstances sometimes have a cathartic, wake- up effect. May it be so for the leaders of our land to pull and work together. May it also be so that we, all of us, begin to understand that we are all in this together. The alternative is staring us in the face----it's the crack up of a once strong, respected, and united America. The election may be over, but the differences are still there---and they threaten to destroy us---or make us better if we can learn to empathize, balance, and reconcile.
Recovery starts with a President, a congress and a people who are willing to find common ground, to blend, to weave a fabric strong enough to hold all of us, and to do more than that---to encourage all of us to fly high, to succeed without punishment, to show others how, and to provide jobs once again. Can we?? How can we afford not to? Forward, march---but watch your step, pack a parachute, a compass, and a good book--this could take a while.
Keep the faith---the American mind may be unpredictable, but its spirit is resilient, and its will to survive, its inventiveness, not to mention its history, may in the end may be more powerful than our bleak circumstances, and even the politicians and leaders who seek, but cannot/will not find the answers. We have them, they are written deep in our collective souls, and freedom is the password---we are bigger than our problems, stronger than our weaknesses, wiser than our mistakes, and we must not fail. Just don't fence us in-----
And as Romney, the man who could have been president, and perhaps should have been, given the evidence at hand, walked off the world stage, one could not help but wonder---what had happened here? This was a man who seemingly had everything going for him---against an encumbent who had very little. The latter, with few exceptions, had only a worried, stressed country who had drifted even further into a recession after he took office, despite his efforts and policies. Nothing seemed to have worked enough to pull us out at a normal rate of recovery. Though there are faint signs, a slight uptick in employment, a sputtering housing re-start, some new manufacturing, but we still seem to be on life support. Nevertheless, a majority of the American people, voted once again for Obama and not for the man who could have given us a fresh start, new hope, and a different vision. But why didn't we take what he had to offer?
Never presume the American mind, much less his/her vote.. The afore mentioned evidence may have been considered, but in the end, what mattered more was their gut instinct based not necessarily on the evidence, but on well, ---that's still up for conjecture and the subject for endless analysis by the pundits and especially the Republicans. But let's give it a try in a moment. Regardless the reasons, this was a major blow for the grand old party---and very possibly reason enough for deep soul searching and a major over haul to their party platforms. But was it really a vote against Romney that caused Obama to win? Or were there other factors at play here?? First, there was Obama, himself--- not so much the president, but the candidate, and one who knows how to win-----nobody does it better.
Obama was never one to sit back and allow the election process to take care of itself---he was a campaigning machine, covering mega miles and raising more money than any other Dem candidate. This was his turf,and he determined to keep it. It was also his forte, what he does best---sell the people not on his failures, but on him---the guy they love to love. He charmed, he entertained, he showed up everywhere where he thought it counted, even snubbing a United Nations meeting, for a larger venue , a TV talk show,"The View." He played it nice, he played it dirty, and he played it Chicago smart---tough. His strategy was not one of proud accomplishments, but one of attack---the only card left for him to play. And he did it brilliantly, using the latest data technology, to target the moving polls, and somehow turning Romney, the squeaky clean man with no dirty laundry into an unsavory business tycoon, with no heart, no conscience, and no chance against the relentless negative ads. For those of you who think negative ads don't work---observe that they did work very well. David Axelrod, Obama's main campaign manager, should also be given dubious credit for designing a very crafty campaign to deconstruct what was, indeed, a formidable opponent. in Mr. Romney. They took no prisoners, and no heed against those who preached against negativity.This was war, and they intended to win---mission accomplished.
Now, let's look at Mitt Romney---he may have been his own worst enemy. Try as he might, he just didn't seem to have the guts for politics---he refused or didn't know how to fight back hard enough, to rebuke the character smearing, the twisted charges leveled against him. Contrary to spin, he wasn't so much a "flip flopper" as a man who changed with the times and the people he governed. He certainly was not a greedy business destroyer, but a savvy entrepenuer who knew how to rescue businesses, thereby saving many jobs. The nail in the coffin was his remark, taken out of context, about the 47% who he said were not worth going after---he meant that no matter what he did, he would not win their hearts or their vote. He was exactly right---but he did not mean, as spun by the media and Obama, that he had no compassion for them. His life and past history are testament of a person who cares for others. He was and is a good and capable man, but this was not his time. nor his country to lead. Perhaps he never was, as the Republican establishment supposedly never fully supported him---word was he was too moderate, not right enough. Three million registered Republicans chose not to vote for him---how bizarre, as though the answer would have been a more right wing candidate. What world are they living in? More " right" wasn't what they needed. What they needed was more fight, light, and a distress call against what was happening---the country was failing under Obama's leadership, or lack thereof. And let's be honest, what the Republicans also lacked was a more inclusive tone, one that spoke more directly to the Black and Hispanic communities, and to the minorities in general. The Womens' vote may have also been an issue, but was mostly a hyped up last ditch effort by the Obama campaign---many of us women maintain that we are far more interested in larger issues, than free condums and abortion laws, which are already pretty much set in stone, and not likely to be challenged; and it was somewhat unsettling to be used as a campaign booster. Perhaps like Sesame Street and Big Bird, we should have protested.
And finally there was us, the American people, perhaps so traumatized by our failing economy and concern over the future, that we found ourselves coming a bit undone and not at all sure of who or what we wanted. We are no longer united with similar values and sense of pride in our country. We are polarized to the point of paralysis, and our once great confidence is changing to doubt and fear of the future. The election was a tug of war between economic concerns and social issues----and that was at the core of Obama's tactical win. He had built his own army by inducing and encouraging class warfare; and Romney and his campaign could not fight the battle of social issues and responsibility with only a recipe for a healthier economy. Never mind that a healthier economy could have been the one thing, perhaps the only antidote, that could bolster and even save our social safety nets---the people didn't see it that way, at least not enough of them.
Mr. Romney tried his best to tell us that, but he was drowned out by mis-charaterization and ridicule---except for one exceptional night, during the first presidential debate, when we saw two men, one very strong, knowledgeable, in control, sure footed and presidential. Obama, on the other hand, was strangely off balance, cut loose from his teleprompter comfort zone, out of his depth, not on his game. Who was the real leader? But we would not see this glimpse of either man again. Obama came back strong, and Romney seemed to lose his mojo and grow weary of the whole impossible thing of fighting an opponent who had what he would never have--- cool charisma, and the emotionally charged, but still effective weapon of Robin Hood---the blame the rich bomb. Romney needed to get angry and fight back, to contest that the rich are not the problem--but that wasn't in his DNA---he was a fix- it guy, not a warrior.
There is talk that we may have seen the demise of the Republican party---that it is out dated, and that it no longer appeals to the majority of the country. We are changing, and it remains to be seen to what---minorities and their needs are growing, the middle class feels weakened, and the wealthy threatened by a rising tide of resentment. Unless the Republicans and their conservative approach to government can convince enough people that their way of thinking, that is, that smaller government is better for everybody, than big government., that the road to more prosperity is not through more taxation, but through a robust economy where everyone is employed , and that dependence on the nipple of government is ultimately a surrender to finding our own strengths and a sacrifice of our freedoms---if they fail to do that, they may have, indeed, lost more than an election.
And one wonders if the vast majority realizes that---or do they no longer care? Are they less interested in what they can do, and more in what can be done for them? Are the social issues so touted during the campaign more important than anything else? It would appear that many thought so, and Obama banked on it. Romney gambled on the promise of jobs, pay checks, self esteem, liberties, independence, a stronger military and country. Yes, important also are better health care, education opportunities for more, higher wages, infrastructure, research investment, a brighter future for our children---all good things, and certainly not limited to the bucket lists of liberals. But that was the way it was presented by Obama and crew, and Romney failed to tell it like it is---that it all costs money, and at the moment we're broke, and need to fix our engine first above all else. It is true that we cannot be truly a great nation without compassion and duty to the less fortunate among us. And perhaps we are only as good as our deeds to correct the imbalance of poor vs. rich. But what isn't true, what obliterates better solutions, is that the rich are the culprits ---and that they must be chastised, demonized, and made to feel guilty. We are a mixed bag, even within our parties, of social vs. economic ideals, and neither party owns nor has all the answers---but we are not the enemy of each other.
That's the big lie, and one the Republicans have to expose and then re-tailor their message . Because, though it was and is the economy," stupid", it's not completely all about the economy. News flash---most all of us care for others and value our social safety nets ---the difference is that the conservative philosophy believes that the best way to offer and sustain helpful programs is to have an economy that can actually afford and support them. It is a pragmatic approach, however, and pragmatism doesn't sell as well as emotionalism. Getting that message across is difficult when the other side insists it is the grandmother being pushed off the cliff by the evil conservative who only cares for himself. It would be funny, if it weren't so patently absurd---would you call your doctor, the one who advises giving you life saving medicine, evil? Or would you, instead, answer the call of those who choose to ignore the warning signs, and continue on the same path? Like I said, negative ads sell. Get used to it---also get used to the fact that money and large contributions are part of the election process. Not going to change, unless free speech is removed from the campaigns.
Elections, second chances, and dire circumstances sometimes have a cathartic, wake- up effect. May it be so for the leaders of our land to pull and work together. May it also be so that we, all of us, begin to understand that we are all in this together. The alternative is staring us in the face----it's the crack up of a once strong, respected, and united America. The election may be over, but the differences are still there---and they threaten to destroy us---or make us better if we can learn to empathize, balance, and reconcile.
Recovery starts with a President, a congress and a people who are willing to find common ground, to blend, to weave a fabric strong enough to hold all of us, and to do more than that---to encourage all of us to fly high, to succeed without punishment, to show others how, and to provide jobs once again. Can we?? How can we afford not to? Forward, march---but watch your step, pack a parachute, a compass, and a good book--this could take a while.
Keep the faith---the American mind may be unpredictable, but its spirit is resilient, and its will to survive, its inventiveness, not to mention its history, may in the end may be more powerful than our bleak circumstances, and even the politicians and leaders who seek, but cannot/will not find the answers. We have them, they are written deep in our collective souls, and freedom is the password---we are bigger than our problems, stronger than our weaknesses, wiser than our mistakes, and we must not fail. Just don't fence us in-----
Friday, November 2, 2012
CLOSING THE SALE----
A seasoned sales person once said, "A sale is made every time"--- meaning that either the customer buys the presented product from you, or someone else----or perhaps not at all. Either way, a sale, a decision, is made every time. In less than a week, the biggest sale in the country will be made--ka-ching, and presto, with millions of clicks in voting booths all over the country. At least half of us will buy with our votes the next president of the USA.
So, who's the better salesman, President Obama, or Governor Romney? Both have spent millions, untold hours, and not just a little sweat on the campaign trail, trying to sell us on their way, their vision, their ability to lead and protect this nation into the next four years. It's a tough sale and we're a tough crowd this time around, with both men still running neck and neck, and passions on both sides at a boiling point. Don't think so? Try bringing up either Obama or Romney's name anywhere, anytime, then watch the red warning lights flash across the eyes of those present---this social taboo could be called the 11th commandment: Thou shalt not discuss politics---in fact, we dare not mention thy name. It is the holiest of grails in polite conversation, and this election is pregnant with potential for explosiveness and less than cordial conversation. Speak at your own risk, or stay safely silent---- but forever wonder if you should have spoken your truth, and removed the mask of nuetrality and harmless bystander.
The differences are stark, so the choice should be easy, but it isn't simply and only a question of who, but which---which kind of governance do we want? Is bigger better? Or is less more? Obama represents the former, and Romney the latter---but there's much more to consider, and within the mix and the decision we must make, lay the seeds of our polarization, the dichotomy of two kinds of America. Will we raise taxes on a few for the many, hoping that that's the fix, or will we cut back on spending, re-structure, and subscribe to the philosophy of jobs creating revenue, rather than vice versa? Conservatives might say, we must decide to buy either the farm, or the farmer---the farm will feed folks for a while, but the farmer will keep things growing for a long time. The Liberal will claim the farmer can't grow at all without a proper and fair farm. You decide.
Whatever, the "cliff" is looming soon if we don't come up with a sustainable budget and how we plan to improve our financial situation---or become another broken country, a la Greece or Spain. It's budget decision time, but none will be made until after the election----we're on hold, and one would be more than naive not to suspect that getting elected is the only real priority. We're watching ourselves burn, as the politicians play politics, then laugh among themselves, like old pals at a recent annual bi-partisan party held at the Waldorf Astoria in New York. How dare they? We're not even smiling---and some of us consider their attempted display of playfulness inappropriate and disingenuous---as though all their words of passionate persuasion and claims to be "fighting" for us, are just a game called politics, and we are the captive audience to their play acting. Will the real leader please stand up and refuse the next party and/or talk show invitation?? And will we learn to bridge our differences before we self destruct?
Aiding and abetting the final attempts to close the sale are unpredictable world and weather events. We didn't even have to wait for the famous "November Surprise". First, in October, we had the hot little mess in Libya, where four of our people, including our ambassador, who had previously pleaded for and was denied more protection, were killed during "an act of terror", not terrorism, mind you, according to Obama--and an incredible back story in which help was requested numerous times. Stunningly, each time the reply and order came back from Washington "to stand down"! This strains the imagination, not to mention credibility, not to further mention faith in our leaders. So much so, that an official investigation is underway, but nobody seems to know from whom the order came---not even the president who likes to say the buck stops with him. Really?? Well, excuse me, but where's the buck, and what the Sam Hill is going on? If that doesn't shake your confidence, then you have already been sold. Obama is your guy, and you feel he must have had his reasons. Perhaps so, ---we can't know everything, but his silence on this matter is mind boggling. Likewise, the polls were reflecting badly for Obama after this incident. Romney was quick to criticize Obama's handling of the situation, and perhaps make political hay, but his numbers were surging. A done deal? Introducing President Romney? Not so fast---.
For, now we have a possible game changer, the predicted November surprise. It's called "Sandy", the horrifically damaging hurricane, and she may well become Obama's newest, best friend. We are now watching a very caring, supposedly prepared, and leaderly president step up to the plate, promising help and money to a very deserving and suffering east coast, but wouldn't any president do the same? Still it was a great photo opp. for Obama, and one he used to his advantage, showing us that he knows well how to do such things, at least here at home. Even Chris Christy, Gov of New Jersey was seen arm in arm with Obama, and praising his help and generosity, proving that Republicans and Democrats really can get along if absolutely necessary---and that presidents can rise to the occasion, on occasion.
At this posting, we have three more days to go, before the election. It's not a done deal yet, and anything could still happen, but what we have learned so far is that while there may be such a thing as the "perfect storm", there is no perfection to be found in presidents or candidates for the highest office in the land--both are flawed in one way or another. Both have fallen short and deserve our scrutiny, ---and perhaps a little forgiveness. What we need now is our collective wisdom and radar perceptiveness to see through the political dialogue, sales tricks and gimmicks--- and discern finally who can best serve our needs at this critical time in our history. There are those who feel our very survival as a viable country rides on this election. The unrest and undertow of fear and discontent is unlike any we've seen in modern times.
It's been a hard fought campaign season for both men and parties---down and dirty, filled with lies, secrets and scandals, enough to have some people opt for choice number 3---no sale, no vote, sitting this one out. That's bailing, wrong, and a cop out, leaving others to to row the boat we're all in. Love it or leave it, it is our process, the way we do things, and through it all we learn a lot about our choices and even ourselves.
Vote on November 6th, exercise your right as an engaged citizen, and help close perhaps the biggest deal in our lifetime. May the best man win, and may he, whoever he is, remember that it is we whom he serves, all of us, not his own ambitions or extreme agendas. Soon we will know who and what we have bought----a sale will have been struck. Ka-ching and good luck. Too bad there isn't a warranty that comes with the deal---and the promises.
God bless us all---especially those affected by "Sandy", who instructs that we and our differences, political and otherwise, are tiny in comparison to the power and strength of apocalypic events that render us helpless and in desperate need of each other, no matter our differences---is someone trying to tell us something?? And does it have nothing at all to do with politics, large or small government, farms or farmers---but a much bigger picture, one that begs for a people to search inwardly for things other than those which continue to divide us? The greatest salesman whoever lived once said---"love ye one another"---are we buying?
So, who's the better salesman, President Obama, or Governor Romney? Both have spent millions, untold hours, and not just a little sweat on the campaign trail, trying to sell us on their way, their vision, their ability to lead and protect this nation into the next four years. It's a tough sale and we're a tough crowd this time around, with both men still running neck and neck, and passions on both sides at a boiling point. Don't think so? Try bringing up either Obama or Romney's name anywhere, anytime, then watch the red warning lights flash across the eyes of those present---this social taboo could be called the 11th commandment: Thou shalt not discuss politics---in fact, we dare not mention thy name. It is the holiest of grails in polite conversation, and this election is pregnant with potential for explosiveness and less than cordial conversation. Speak at your own risk, or stay safely silent---- but forever wonder if you should have spoken your truth, and removed the mask of nuetrality and harmless bystander.
The differences are stark, so the choice should be easy, but it isn't simply and only a question of who, but which---which kind of governance do we want? Is bigger better? Or is less more? Obama represents the former, and Romney the latter---but there's much more to consider, and within the mix and the decision we must make, lay the seeds of our polarization, the dichotomy of two kinds of America. Will we raise taxes on a few for the many, hoping that that's the fix, or will we cut back on spending, re-structure, and subscribe to the philosophy of jobs creating revenue, rather than vice versa? Conservatives might say, we must decide to buy either the farm, or the farmer---the farm will feed folks for a while, but the farmer will keep things growing for a long time. The Liberal will claim the farmer can't grow at all without a proper and fair farm. You decide.
Whatever, the "cliff" is looming soon if we don't come up with a sustainable budget and how we plan to improve our financial situation---or become another broken country, a la Greece or Spain. It's budget decision time, but none will be made until after the election----we're on hold, and one would be more than naive not to suspect that getting elected is the only real priority. We're watching ourselves burn, as the politicians play politics, then laugh among themselves, like old pals at a recent annual bi-partisan party held at the Waldorf Astoria in New York. How dare they? We're not even smiling---and some of us consider their attempted display of playfulness inappropriate and disingenuous---as though all their words of passionate persuasion and claims to be "fighting" for us, are just a game called politics, and we are the captive audience to their play acting. Will the real leader please stand up and refuse the next party and/or talk show invitation?? And will we learn to bridge our differences before we self destruct?
Aiding and abetting the final attempts to close the sale are unpredictable world and weather events. We didn't even have to wait for the famous "November Surprise". First, in October, we had the hot little mess in Libya, where four of our people, including our ambassador, who had previously pleaded for and was denied more protection, were killed during "an act of terror", not terrorism, mind you, according to Obama--and an incredible back story in which help was requested numerous times. Stunningly, each time the reply and order came back from Washington "to stand down"! This strains the imagination, not to mention credibility, not to further mention faith in our leaders. So much so, that an official investigation is underway, but nobody seems to know from whom the order came---not even the president who likes to say the buck stops with him. Really?? Well, excuse me, but where's the buck, and what the Sam Hill is going on? If that doesn't shake your confidence, then you have already been sold. Obama is your guy, and you feel he must have had his reasons. Perhaps so, ---we can't know everything, but his silence on this matter is mind boggling. Likewise, the polls were reflecting badly for Obama after this incident. Romney was quick to criticize Obama's handling of the situation, and perhaps make political hay, but his numbers were surging. A done deal? Introducing President Romney? Not so fast---.
For, now we have a possible game changer, the predicted November surprise. It's called "Sandy", the horrifically damaging hurricane, and she may well become Obama's newest, best friend. We are now watching a very caring, supposedly prepared, and leaderly president step up to the plate, promising help and money to a very deserving and suffering east coast, but wouldn't any president do the same? Still it was a great photo opp. for Obama, and one he used to his advantage, showing us that he knows well how to do such things, at least here at home. Even Chris Christy, Gov of New Jersey was seen arm in arm with Obama, and praising his help and generosity, proving that Republicans and Democrats really can get along if absolutely necessary---and that presidents can rise to the occasion, on occasion.
At this posting, we have three more days to go, before the election. It's not a done deal yet, and anything could still happen, but what we have learned so far is that while there may be such a thing as the "perfect storm", there is no perfection to be found in presidents or candidates for the highest office in the land--both are flawed in one way or another. Both have fallen short and deserve our scrutiny, ---and perhaps a little forgiveness. What we need now is our collective wisdom and radar perceptiveness to see through the political dialogue, sales tricks and gimmicks--- and discern finally who can best serve our needs at this critical time in our history. There are those who feel our very survival as a viable country rides on this election. The unrest and undertow of fear and discontent is unlike any we've seen in modern times.
It's been a hard fought campaign season for both men and parties---down and dirty, filled with lies, secrets and scandals, enough to have some people opt for choice number 3---no sale, no vote, sitting this one out. That's bailing, wrong, and a cop out, leaving others to to row the boat we're all in. Love it or leave it, it is our process, the way we do things, and through it all we learn a lot about our choices and even ourselves.
Vote on November 6th, exercise your right as an engaged citizen, and help close perhaps the biggest deal in our lifetime. May the best man win, and may he, whoever he is, remember that it is we whom he serves, all of us, not his own ambitions or extreme agendas. Soon we will know who and what we have bought----a sale will have been struck. Ka-ching and good luck. Too bad there isn't a warranty that comes with the deal---and the promises.
God bless us all---especially those affected by "Sandy", who instructs that we and our differences, political and otherwise, are tiny in comparison to the power and strength of apocalypic events that render us helpless and in desperate need of each other, no matter our differences---is someone trying to tell us something?? And does it have nothing at all to do with politics, large or small government, farms or farmers---but a much bigger picture, one that begs for a people to search inwardly for things other than those which continue to divide us? The greatest salesman whoever lived once said---"love ye one another"---are we buying?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)